From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Yuqi Xu <xuyuqiabc@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>,
Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai>,
xuyq21@lenovo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] tpm: reject duplicate PCR banks in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:25:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arwssp0czGg9XKv7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d27c4513a3c6fc32f9574ba192cd3bfcb2bac98.1790568982.git.xuyuqiabc@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 04:27:00PM +0800, Yuqi Xu wrote:
> The TPM2_CAP_PCRS response is external input. tpm2_get_pcr_allocation()
> adds every active selection to allocated_banks, while
> tpm_sysfs_add_device() has one group slot per distinct hash algorithm.
> Eight duplicate selections can therefore write past chip->groups[].
>
> The TPM protocol does not allow a hash algorithm to appear twice in
> this capability response. Treat a duplicate as a broken TPM and return
> -EIO so the chip is not enabled, instead of silently dropping the
> extra selection.
>
> Fixes: aab73d952402 ("tpm: add sysfs exports for all banks of PCR registers")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Yuqi Xu <xuyuqiabc@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Return -EIO on a duplicate PCR bank instead of silently ignoring
> it, as requested by Jarkko Sakkinen. A duplicate violates the TPM
> protocol, so the chip is not enabled.
> - v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1789800840.git.xuyuqiabc@gmail.com/
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> index ae22295df798..a94f4395c198 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,7 @@ ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> u32 rsp_len;
> int rc;
> int i = 0;
> + int j;
>
> struct tpm_buf *buf __free(kfree) = kzalloc(TPM_BUFSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buf)
> @@ -569,6 +570,23 @@ ssize_t tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> pcr_select_offset = memchr_inv(pcr_selection.pcr_select, 0,
> pcr_selection.size_of_select);
> if (pcr_select_offset) {
> + for (j = 0; j < nr_alloc_banks; j++) {
> + if (chip->allocated_banks[j].alg_id == hash_alg)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The TPM protocol does not allow the same hash
> + * algorithm twice. A duplicate means this device
> + * is not behaving; do not enable it.
> + */
> + if (j != nr_alloc_banks) {
> + pr_err("tpm: duplicate PCR bank for algorithm 0x%04x\n",
> + hash_alg);
> + rc = -EIO;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> chip->allocated_banks[nr_alloc_banks].alg_id = hash_alg;
>
> rc = tpm2_init_bank_info(chip, nr_alloc_banks);
> --
> 2.55.0
>
Yeah, so in some places like this some of the TPM driver code does
return -EFAULT but I'd like to progressively refactor so that any
corrupted traffic is always -EIO and use -EFAULT for memory related
issues.
Thank you!
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Br, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 8:26 [PATCH v2 0/1] tpm: reject duplicate PCR banks in tpm2_get_pcr_allocation Yuqi Xu
2026-09-28 8:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Yuqi Xu
2026-09-29 21:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-09-29 22:34 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-09-30 3:33 ` Yuqi Xu
2026-09-30 6:30 ` Yuan Tan
2026-10-02 3:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arwssp0czGg9XKv7@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=weir@nebusec.ai \
--cc=xuyq21@lenovo.com \
--cc=xuyuqiabc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox