From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893EC433E5 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDFC22B40 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726878AbgHCRRK (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:17:10 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:22280 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728174AbgHCRRJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:17:09 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 073H3Xmg130762; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:16:40 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32pnn326rx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:16:40 -0400 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 073H3e6c131598; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:16:40 -0400 Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32pnn326ra-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:16:39 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 073H6frY002431; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:16:38 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32n0189f41-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 17:16:37 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 073HGZbV26083630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:16:35 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0094C04A; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:16:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3AF4C046; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:16:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.52.50]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:16:34 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ima-evm-utils: PATCH 5/5] ima-evm-utils: travis: openssl gost engine From: Mimi Zohar To: Petr Vorel Cc: Vitaly Chikunov , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Bruno Meneguele Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:16:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200803164635.GB4914@dell5510> References: <20200731182408.696931-6-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <20200731185633.kqgcz4dwfa4ruyld@altlinux.org> <20200731201808.GA27841@dell5510> <20200731202638.x5mnkz7hcpgbveu2@altlinux.org> <20200731204044.GC27841@dell5510> <20200731210653.p5m4efy52melqwgs@altlinux.org> <8c9e64a3b461fb20cda761ef0fc0728a55448937.camel@linux.ibm.com> <1157c464d49cb6297fc2f20771d73a4cf7ce6599.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20200803130755.GA30440@dell5510> <22a744e9520237907312d1f71293df0dd809805f.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20200803164635.GB4914@dell5510> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-12.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-03_15:2020-08-03,2020-08-03 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2008030123 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 18:46 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > Hi all, > > ... > > > @Mimi: As I wrote, I'd suggest moving to docker based travis. I can do it once > > > other issues are addressed, if this setup work for your internal travis support > > > as well. See examples .travis.yml [1] [2], builds: [3] [4]. > > > Advantages are more realistic builds for distro maintainers (different libc and > > > libraries versions, you can test old and new distro releases, etc), but maybe > > > that's not what you want/need. > > > Disadvantage is that sometimes docker releases have temporary packaging related > > > issues (first build in [3]; failure in first build [4] is a bug in LTP, corner > > > case, which would be otherwise undiscovered a long time). > > Nice! I definitely want to move to a docker based travis. How should > > we move forward? Should there be a 1.3.1 release now with just the > > few changes in the next branch and include the existing travis branch > > with changes to address Vitaly's comments? I left off the list TPM 2.0 --pcr support, but the kernel code for exporting the sysfs TPM 2.0 pcrs hasn't been upstreamed yet. I guess we should wait for that to be upstreamed or at least queued to be upstreamed. > Yes, that would work for me. Travis changes aren't related to the release > (it just needs to be published in git), let's give users the fixes. Ok. > > Docker based setup shouldn't take long It's all about to find the dependencies > for used distros (I usually keep them in travis/ directory [5] [6]) and agree on the > variants (which distros, how many jobs are still meaningful, which crypto and > TPM libraries, whether use also: clang, non-intel archs and cross-compilation). Great! Mimi