From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-111.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-111.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F37B39EF23; Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:05:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.111 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780995921; cv=none; b=pag8h7Na8EQ6cZk5Mx69IhZBAxlt+U0UlauGEQgIFZDV2W/PKG55nOAu13pJ36oUfBXfOQ3PCKVYZGDbjDLjyCfLGERdtKQQ8trDlMNmLkxl54nOClkEc1reFbqnCyq9DQFPWeuRn6OkTvwS+KzWksuzupe12a89Z9p2OMuUUlE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780995921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6ahOKGWhGv78RMA0wC7cY/2iSyNGFmRNo4+FTJxzhcI=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cU3SFAfOQSi3ZdRjVCyUb1emYcmu9e9B/SFz2JjkXwghCvdcrMAcnp75z4vRIS3oaWWfmc1WymatpJ+2nQjpCO0GhqN9PESQsQOygwrHf5euPR+JPVPSY2gEWFVX6oJNeaqatoNTWUO2GRz0/2eolw8/iwgXAG13VWlRJ2I9/mQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=IC5g+LfR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.111 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="IC5g+LfR" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1780995916; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Subject; bh=6ahOKGWhGv78RMA0wC7cY/2iSyNGFmRNo4+FTJxzhcI=; b=IC5g+LfRkl4PiEpxyq4e5LiY9OUvhM1ZQYpqeXU00KWoeHdZ59GpEBhpreFzNgTAshJ+BUdxPM3YysEhfhIhjx2BikSqcKSo48d+kNPcg5CpV3szo/KpQczc2cbwFQVSj5aW5GsMQ8UhK1/vtNKg8qBCBGIZAKjyFRHrJQ3HT70= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033045133197;MF=zongyao.chen@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0X4Vy9R8_1780995914; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0X4Vy9R8_1780995914 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:05:15 +0800 Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:05:14 +0800 Message-ID: From: ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe , Nayna Jain , Tianjia Zhang , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: eventlog: tpm2: allow event log entries ending at the log boundary In-Reply-To: References: <20260604025356.3436943-1-ZongYao.Chen@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 07:06:45AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > This looks unnecessary turnover. Please rethink. We should be minizing > the diff for bug fixes, not the other way around. Hi Jarkko, You're right, please drop this patch. After closer investigation, the issue turned out to be caused by non-compliant firmware rather than a kernel bug. I will not pursue this change. Sorry for the noise. Zongyao