From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question on loading trusted key with keyctl command
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 09:03:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8df26bb38ac342ab32c31ba0b5f17da4c79560a.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e1c8d3bd5742979e328a267522347ad39b483a3.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 08:54 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 07:50 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 12:03 +0530, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
[...]
> > > I was able to load the key after clearing the keyring. Thanks
> > > James and Mimi for your pointers.
> >
> > Actually, I think this is a bug in trusted keys. Add on existing
> > key is supposed to go through the update path. If the path doesn't
> > exist it returns -EEXIST. Trusted keys have an update path but
> > they return - EINVAL if the trusted key command is anything but
> > update (which is used to reseal a key). Obviously this is
> > incorrect and the code should be returning -EEXIST for a key we
> > refuse to update to match every other key type.
>
> Re-loading an existing key was previously permitted. Obviously this
> changed at some point. Any "fixes" should point out when it
> changed.
Git history doesn't think so. It thinks when you added trusted keys
with d00a1c72f7f4661212299e6cb132dfa58030bcdb the update path already
had the -EINVAL return, so reload has always failed this way unless we
were doing a reseal update. We could certainly permit overwriting an
existing key with load, but that would be a more extensive change.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-19 10:20 Question on loading trusted key with keyctl command Sughosh Ganu
2022-12-19 11:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-12-19 12:50 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-20 6:33 ` Sughosh Ganu
2022-12-20 12:50 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-20 13:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-12-20 14:03 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2022-12-20 14:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-12-20 14:23 ` James Bottomley
2022-12-20 15:40 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8df26bb38ac342ab32c31ba0b5f17da4c79560a.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sughosh.ganu@linaro.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox