Re: [PATCH 0/2] ima: add dont_audit and fs_subtype to policy language

[Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2025-09-26 at 01:45 +0200, Jann Horn wrote:
> This series adds a "dont_audit" action that cancels out following
> "audit" actions (as we already have for other action types), and also
> adds an "fs_subtype" that can be used to distinguish between FUSE
> filesystems.
> 
> With these two patches applied, as a toy example, you can use the
> following policy:
> ```
> dont_audit fsname=fuse fs_subtype=sshfs
> audit func=BPRM_CHECK fsname=fuse
> ```
> 
> I have tested that with this policy, executing a binary from a
> "fuse-zip" FUSE filesystem results in an audit log entry:
> ```
> type=INTEGRITY_RULE msg=audit([...]): file="/home/user/ima/zipmount/usr/bin/echo" hash="sha256:1d82e8[...]
> ```
> while executing a binary from an "sshfs" FUSE filesystem does not
> generate any audit log entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>


Thanks, Jann.  The patches look fine.  Assuming the "toy" test program creates
and mounts the fuse filesystems, not just loads the IMA policy rules, could you
share it?

thanks,

Mimi