From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc: "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Silviu Vlasceanu" <Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 09:45:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h367jmbfe.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22f1132ebc9d4c2e8fc354efb1845984@huawei.com>
On Fri, 29 May 2020 09:33:34 +0200,
Roberto Sassu wrote:
>
> > From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@suse.de]
> > On Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:55 +0200,
> > Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> > > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Takashi Iwai
> > > > On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:35:16 +0200,
> > > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Roberto,
> > > > >
> > > > > it seems that the recent changes in IMA in linux-next caused a
> > > > > regression: namely it triggers an Oops when booting with the options
> > > > > ima_policy=tcb ima_template_fmt='d-ng|n-ng|d|ng'
> > > >
> > > > And further experiment revealed that passing only
> > ima_template_fmt=d
> > > > is enough for triggering the bug. Other formats don't matter.
> > > >
> > > > (snip)
> > > > > It's a KVM instance without any TPM stuff, just passed the options
> > > > > above. I could trigger the same bug on a bare metal, too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then I performed bisection and it spotted the commit:
> > > > > 6f1a1d103b48b1533a9c804e7a069e2c8e937ce7
> > > > > ima: Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually reverting this commit fixed the Oops again.
> > > >
> > > > So, looking at the fact above (triggered by "d") and this bisection
> > > > result, it seems that the issue is specific to ima_eventdigest_init().
> > > > The difference from others is that this has a check by
> > > > ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(), and currently the check allows only
> > > > SHA1 and MD5, while now SHA256 is assigned as default. So I tested
> > > > adding SHA256 there like below, and it seems working.
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully I'm heading to a right direction...
> > >
> > > Hi Takashi
> > >
> > > boot_aggregate is the only entry for which there is no file descriptor.
> > > The file descriptor is used to recalculate the digest if it is not SHA1
> > > or MD5. For boot_aggregate, we should use instead
> > > ima_calc_boot_aggregate(). I will provide a patch.
> > >
> > > I see that the .file member of event_data in
> > > ima_add_boot_aggregate() is not initialized. Can you please try
> > > to set .file to NULL?
> >
> > Tested and it didn't help. The field was already zero-initialized via
> > C99-style initialization, I believe.
>
> Found the issue.
>
> ima_evendigest_init() returns an error and after that IMA is not
> initialized. Unfortunately, ima_must_appraise() does not check
> ima_policy_flag, so the kernel crashes when ima_match_policy()
> tries to evaluate the policy which is not loaded (ima_rules = NULL).
>
> if you add at the beginning of ima_must_appraise()
>
> if (!ima_policy_flag)
> return 0;
>
> the kernel should not crash.
Confirmed. The patch below fixed the Oops.
When you cook up a proper patch with that change, feel free to put my
tested-by tag
Reported-and-tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Thanks!
Takashi
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func)
if (!ima_appraise)
return 0;
+ if (!ima_policy_flag)
+ return 0;
+
security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), secid, func, mask,
IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL, NULL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 15:35 Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options Takashi Iwai
2020-05-28 16:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-05-28 17:36 ` Roberto Sassu
2020-05-28 18:02 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-05-29 7:33 ` Roberto Sassu
2020-05-29 7:45 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2020-05-31 18:50 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5h367jmbfe.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).