From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] iommu: IOMMU Groups
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:07:34 +1000
Message-ID: <1340237254.28143.201.camel@pasglop>
References: <20120530201424.31527.33142.stgit@bling.home>
	<20120530201852.31527.23265.stgit@bling.home>
	<1340186501.28143.158.camel@pasglop>
	<1340210921.5076.76.camel@bling.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1340210921.5076.76.camel-xdHQ/5r00wBBDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/iommu>,
	<mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/>
List-Post: <mailto:iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu>,
	<mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: aik-sLpHqDYs0B2HXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, liuj97-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org
List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org

On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:48 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:

> Yes, I was assuming the caller held a reference to the struct device to
> prevent such a race, looks like I forgot to document that in the
> comments.  I'll have to think about if we can fix the ordering problem.
> We can re-order the list_add vs notification, but then we just risk
> dropping the remove.  Perhaps we need to extend the lock or add another
> to group {list add, notify add}, {list lookup, remove, notify remove}.
> I'm not even sure this race is possible though w/ a device reference.

Or we put the burden on the callers not to racily add & remove,
including full completion of related notifiers. Might not even be hard
(ie might already be the case).

Cheers,
Ben.