From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D01A8C28CC3 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2BD248CB for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AE2BD248CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787FDA70; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349BCA70 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EA56D6 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADBC80D; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.129] (ostrya.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.129]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3D9C3F5AF; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/29] iommu: Add a timeout parameter for PRQ response To: Alex Williamson , Eric Auger References: <20190526161004.25232-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190526161004.25232-6-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190603163214.483884a7@x1.home> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Message-ID: <13428eef-9b95-0f79-bebf-317a2205673a@arm.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:52:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190603163214.483884a7@x1.home> Content-Language: en-US Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" , "kevin.tian@intel.com" , "ashok.raj@intel.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Vincent Stehle , Robin Murphy , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On 03/06/2019 23:32, Alex Williamson wrote: > It doesn't seem to make much sense to include this patch without also > including "iommu: handle page response timeout". Was that one lost? > Dropped? Lives elsewhere? The first 7 patches come from my sva/api branch, where I had forgotten to add the "handle page response timeout" patch. I added it back, probably after Eric sent this version. But I don't think the patch is ready for upstream, as we still haven't decided how to proceed with timeouts. Patches 6 and 7 are for debugging, I don't know if they should go upstream. Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu