From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Akinobu Mita Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] memblock: introduce memblock_alloc_range() Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:13:49 +0900 Message-ID: <1389708830-5841-5-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> References: <1389708830-5841-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1389708830-5841-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Cc: Andi Kleen , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Akinobu Mita , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org This introduces memblock_alloc_range() which allocates memblock from the specified range of physical address. I would like to use this function to specify the location of CMA. Cc: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Don Dutile Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita --- New patch from this version include/linux/memblock.h | 2 ++ mm/memblock.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index 77c60e5..95e0cfa 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ static inline bool memblock_bottom_up(void) { return false; } #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE (~(phys_addr_t)0) #define MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE 0 +phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, + phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end); phys_addr_t memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr); phys_addr_t __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 53e477b..83b0542 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -864,25 +864,38 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, } #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */ -static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, - phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr, - int nid) +static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range_nid(phys_addr_t size, + phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t start, + phys_addr_t end, int nid) { phys_addr_t found; if (WARN_ON(!align)) align = __alignof__(long long); - /* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */ - size = round_up(size, align); - - found = memblock_find_in_range_node(0, max_addr, size, align, nid); + found = memblock_find_in_range_node(start, end, size, align, nid); if (found && !memblock_reserve(found, size)) return found; return 0; } +phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, + phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end) +{ + return memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, align, start, end, MAX_NUMNODES); +} + +static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base_nid(phys_addr_t size, + phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr, + int nid) +{ + /* align @size to avoid excessive fragmentation on reserved array */ + size = round_up(size, align); + + return memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, align, 0, max_addr, nid); +} + phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid) { return memblock_alloc_base_nid(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid); -- 1.8.3.2