From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, zhen-hual@hp.com,
bhe@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Don't consider copied context entries as present
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:44:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434033896.3907.61.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150611142554.GG16345@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3362 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 16:25 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:07:02PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:47 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> > >
> > > Hide the copied context entries from the IOMMU driver by
> > > considering them as non-present. This is implemented by
> > > setting the first AVL bit (bit 67) in the context entry to
> > > one. If this bit is set, the context_present() function
> > > returns false.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> >
> > In the extended context entry, bit 67 is the PGE bit. There are no bits
> > which are available to software, to my knowledge.
>
> Okay, reading the VT-d spec again, the extended context-entry table seem
> to exist in parallel to the current context-entry table, right? So this
> patch should still work, even with extended entries present.
No, the extended context-entry exists *instead* of the legacy
context-entry. Note that all the bits in the legacy context-entry are
present in precisely the same place in the extended context-entry. It's
just that the extended context-entry defines meanings for more of them.
When you enable the DMA_RTADDR_RTT bit in the Root Table Address
register, the context-entries magically double in size.
It used to look like this:
Root Table Address Register
|
V
Root Table (struct root_entry) Context Table (struct context_entry)
------------------------------ ------------------------------------
0x00: Context-table pointer -----> Context entry for 00:00.0
0x08: unused Context entry for 00:00.1
0x10: unused Context entry for 00:00.2
... ... ...
0xff8:... Context entry for ff:1f.7
Now it looks like this
Root Table Address Register
|
V
Root Table (struct root_entry) Context Table (struct context_entry)
------------------------------ ------------------------------------
0x00: Context-table ptr #1 -----> Context entry for 00:00.0: lo
0x08: Context-table ptr #2 --, Context entry for 00:00.0: hi
0x10: unused | Context entry for 00:00.1: lo
... ... | ...
0xff8:... | Context entry for 7f:1f.7: hi
|
|
| Context Table (struct context_entry)
--> ------------------------------------
0x00: Context entry for 80:00.0: lo
0x08: Context entry for 80:00.1: hi
... ...
0xff8: Context entry for ff:1f.7: hi
This was implemented in http://git.kernel.org/linus/03ecc32c52 but
*all* that patch did was allocate the second page of context-table,
fill in the appropriate new pointer in the root table, and adjust the
way we calculate the *location* of a context-entry. In 4.1 we're still
only using the same old bits of the context-entry, which as noted are
in the same place in both cases. Even the mapping from the old 2-bit T
field to the new 3-bit TT field works out that way, for now.
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5691 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 13:47 [PATCH 0/4] More cleanups and fixes for Intel VT-d Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <1434030463-942-1-git-send-email-joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-11 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove iommu_attach_domain_with_id() Joerg Roedel
2015-06-11 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Don't consider copied context entries as present Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <1434030463-942-3-git-send-email-joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-11 14:07 ` David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <1434031622.3907.40.camel-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-11 14:12 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20150611141256.GF16345-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-11 14:19 ` David Woodhouse
2015-06-11 14:25 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-06-11 14:44 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2015-06-11 15:12 ` David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <20150611142554.GG16345-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-11 14:51 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-06-11 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove unmap_device_dma() Joerg Roedel
2015-06-11 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Make sure si_domain is allocated for kdump kernel Joerg Roedel
2015-06-11 15:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] More cleanups and fixes for Intel VT-d David Woodhouse
2015-06-12 7:31 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <1434038066.3907.85.camel-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-12 20:29 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1434033896.3907.61.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhen-hual@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox