From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@mediatek.com>,
Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>,
Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>, CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@google.com>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
youlin.pei@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] memory: mediatek: Add a new interface mtk_smi_larb_is_ready
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:31:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469496708.3072.4.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd01b829-f869-606b-5c1a-8077fbddb085@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 10:39 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 20/07/16 05:01, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Currently the iommu consumer always call iommu_present to get whether
> > the iommu is ready. But in MTK IOMMU, this function can't indicate
> > this. The IOMMU call bus_set_iommu->mtk_iommu_add_device->
> > mtk_iommu_attach_device to parse the iommu data, then it's able to
> > transfer "struct mtk_smi_iommu" to SMI-LARB, and the iommu uses the
> > larbs as compoents, the iommu will finish its probe until all the larbs
> > probe done.
> >
> > If the iommu consumer(like DRM) begin to probe after the time of
> > calling bus_set_iommu and before the time of SMI probe finish, it
> > will hang like this:
> >
> > [ 7.832359] Call trace:
> > [ 7.834778] [<ffffffc000764424>] mtk_smi_larb_get+0x24/0xa8
> > [ 7.840300] [<ffffffc0005a1390>] mtk_drm_crtc_enable+0x6c/0x450
> >
> > Because the larb->mmu is NULL at that time.
> >
> > In order to avoid this issue, we add a new interface
> > (mtk_smi_larb_is_ready) for checking whether the IOMMU and SMI have
> > finished their probe. If it return false, the iommu consumer should
> > probe-defer for the IOMMU and SMI.
> >
>
> Can't we just skip the functions in the probe and call bus_set_iommu
> only if we were able to bind all components?
> Something like this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index c3043d8..0bef49b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -649,10 +649,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = component_master_add_with_match(dev, &mtk_iommu_com_ops,
> match);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &mtk_iommu_ops);
>
> - return component_master_add_with_match(dev, &mtk_iommu_com_ops,
> match);
> + return ret;
> }
Thanks very much for your suggestion, I have tried and this seems don't
work.
I don't know much about component, so add some logs.
component_master_add_with_match only add the ops into a list, it won't
wait for the smi-larb probe done. Below is the log, it will return
quickly.
[ 0.095073] mtk-iommu 10205000.iommu: begin to probe
[ 0.095922] mtk-iommu 10205000.iommu: probe hw init
[ 0.095948] mtk-iommu 10205000.iommu: trying to bring up master
[ 0.095967] mtk-iommu 10205000.iommu: master has incomplete
components
The binder callback(mtk_iommu_bind) is called in this backtrace:
[ 0.555718] [<ffff00000849e6ec>] mtk_iommu_bind+0x14/0x48
[ 0.556405] [<ffff00000850a860>] try_to_bring_up_master.part.6
+0x38/0x88
[ 0.557255] [<ffff00000850b014>] component_add+0x158/0x208
[ 0.557954] [<ffff0000087352a4>] mtk_smi_larb_probe+0xf8/0x134
[ 0.558696] [<ffff000008511838>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xc8
[ 0.559427] [<ffff00000850fcfc>] driver_probe_device+0x224/0x2c4
[ 0.560191] [<ffff00000850ff08>] __device_attach_driver+0x98/0xc8
[ 0.560966] [<ffff00000850dea0>] bus_for_each_drv+0x58/0x98
[ 0.561676] [<ffff00000850fa3c>] __device_attach+0xbc/0x124
[ 0.562385] [<ffff0000085100a4>] device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
[ 0.563138] [<ffff00000850ef48>] bus_probe_device+0x90/0x98
[ 0.563848] [<ffff00000850f3e4>] deferred_probe_work_func+0x7c/0xb0
Thus, It looks like mtk_iommu_bind is called in mtk_smi_larb_probe which
will be delayed by power-domain.
then iommu_present is true even though M4U and SMI-larb have not
finished their component binding.
>
>
>
> static int mtk_iommu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 3:01 [PATCH 1/3] memory: mediatek: Add a new interface mtk_smi_larb_is_ready Yong Wu
[not found] ` <1468983721-3627-1-git-send-email-yong.wu-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-20 3:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/mediatek: Add probe-defer for MTK IOMMU and SMI Yong Wu
2016-07-20 3:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] vcodec: mediatek: " Yong Wu
2016-07-25 8:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] memory: mediatek: Add a new interface mtk_smi_larb_is_ready Matthias Brugger
2016-07-26 1:31 ` Yong Wu [this message]
2016-07-26 2:30 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1469496708.3072.4.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
--cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
--cc=djkurtz@google.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=honghui.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@google.com \
--cc=tiffany.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
--cc=yt.shen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).