iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Darrel Goeddel <DGoeddel@forcepoint.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Mark Scott <mscott@forcepoint.com>,
	Romil Sharma <rsharma@forcepoint.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Relax ACS requirement for RCiEP devices.
Date: Mon,  4 May 2020 21:42:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1588653736-10835-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com> (raw)

PCIe Spec recommends we can relax ACS requirement for RCIEP devices.

PCIe 5.0 Specification.
6.12 Access Control Services (ACS)
Implementation of ACS in RCiEPs is permitted but not required. It is
explicitly permitted that, within a single Root Complex, some RCiEPs
implement ACS and some do not. It is strongly recommended that Root Complex
implementations ensure that all accesses originating from RCiEPs
(PFs and VFs) without ACS capability are first subjected to processing by
the Translation Agent (TA) in the Root Complex before further decoding and
processing. The details of such Root Complex handling are outside the scope
of this specification.

Since Linux didn't give special treatment to allow this exception, certain
RCiEP MFD devices are getting grouped in a single iommu group. This
doesn't permit a single device to be assigned to a guest for instance.

In one vendor system: Device 14.x were grouped in a single IOMMU group.

/sys/kernel/iommu_groups/5/devices/0000:00:14.0
/sys/kernel/iommu_groups/5/devices/0000:00:14.2
/sys/kernel/iommu_groups/5/devices/0000:00:14.3

After the patch:
/sys/kernel/iommu_groups/5/devices/0000:00:14.0
/sys/kernel/iommu_groups/5/devices/0000:00:14.2
/sys/kernel/iommu_groups/6/devices/0000:00:14.3 <<< new group

14.0 and 14.2 are integrated devices, but legacy end points.
Whereas 14.3 was a PCIe compliant RCiEP.

00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Device 9df0 (rev 30)
Capabilities: [40] Express (v2) Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00

This permits assigning this device to a guest VM.

Fixes: f096c061f552 ("iommu: Rework iommu_group_get_for_pci_dev()")
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Darrel Goeddel <DGoeddel@forcepoint.com>
Cc: Mark Scott <mscott@forcepoint.com>,
Cc: Romil Sharma <rsharma@forcepoint.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 2b471419e26c..5744bd65f3e2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1187,7 +1187,20 @@ static struct iommu_group *get_pci_function_alias_group(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
 	struct iommu_group *group;
 
-	if (!pdev->multifunction || pci_acs_enabled(pdev, REQ_ACS_FLAGS))
+	/*
+	 * PCI Spec 5.0, Section 6.12 Access Control Service
+	 * Implementation of ACS in RCiEPs is permitted but not required.
+	 * It is explicitly permitted that, within a single Root
+	 * Complex, some RCiEPs implement ACS and some do not. It is
+	 * strongly recommended that Root Complex implementations ensure
+	 * that all accesses originating from RCiEPs (PFs and VFs) without
+	 * ACS capability are first subjected to processing by the Translation
+	 * Agent (TA) in the Root Complex before further decoding and
+	 * processing.
+	 */
+	if (!pdev->multifunction ||
+	    (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) ||
+	     pci_acs_enabled(pdev, REQ_ACS_FLAGS))
 		return NULL;
 
 	for_each_pci_dev(tmp) {
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-05  4:42 Ashok Raj [this message]
2020-05-05  5:19 ` [PATCH] iommu: Relax ACS requirement for RCiEP devices Alex Williamson
2020-05-05  6:11   ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-05 14:05     ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-05 14:56       ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-05 15:34         ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-26 18:06           ` Raj, Ashok
2020-05-26 18:26             ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-26 18:34               ` Raj, Ashok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1588653736-10835-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --to=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=DGoeddel@forcepoint.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mscott@forcepoint.com \
    --cc=rsharma@forcepoint.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).