From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Liu, Jingqi" <jingqi.liu@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Prevent RESV_DIRECT devices from blocking domains
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:21:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c8f6bf4-f0ad-2888-ada0-056c12647c41@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB527613D6C657A4AE0DE169758C27A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2023/6/27 16:15, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 4:01 PM
>>
>> On 2023/6/27 15:54, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Baolu Lu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 11:15 AM
>>>>
>>>> On 6/12/23 4:28 PM, Liu, Jingqi wrote:
>>>>> On 6/7/2023 11:51 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - BUG_ON(!domain->pgsize_bitmap);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - pg_size = 1UL << __ffs(domain->pgsize_bitmap);
>>>>>> + pg_size = domain->pgsize_bitmap ? 1UL <<
>>>>>> __ffs(domain->pgsize_bitmap) : 0;
>>>>> Would it be better to add the following check here?
>>>>> if (WARN_ON(!pg_size))
>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>
>>>>> Instead of checking latter in the loop as follows.
>>>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pg_size)) {
>>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>>>> goto out;
>>>>> }
>>>> I am afraid no. Only the paging domains need a valid pg_size. That's the
>>>> reason why I put it after the iommu_is_dma_domain() check. The
>> previous
>>>> code has the same behavior too.
>>>>
>>> You could also add the dma domain check here. pg_size is static
>>> then it makes more sense to verify it once instead of in a loop.
>> Agreed. Does below additional change make sense?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> index e59de7852067..3be88b5f36bb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>> @@ -962,6 +962,9 @@ static int
>> iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> pg_size = domain->pgsize_bitmap ? 1UL <<
>> __ffs(domain->pgsize_bitmap) : 0;
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mappings);
>>
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE((domain->type & __IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING)
>> &&
>> !pg_size))
>> + return -EINVAL;
> what's the reason of not using iommu_is_dma_domain()? this is called
> in the probe path only for the default domain. Otherwise if you change
> like this then you also want to change the check in the loop later to be
> consistent.
>
Yes. iommu_is_dma_domain() is better.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-07 3:51 [PATCH 0/2] Prevent RESV_DIRECT devices from user assignment Lu Baolu
2023-06-07 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu: Prevent RESV_DIRECT devices from blocking domains Lu Baolu
2023-06-12 8:28 ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-06-13 3:14 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-27 7:54 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-06-27 8:01 ` Baolu Lu
2023-06-27 8:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-06-27 8:21 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2023-06-27 15:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-19 13:33 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-19 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-19 14:20 ` Robin Murphy
2023-06-19 15:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-27 8:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-06-27 15:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-07 3:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Remove rmrr check in domain attaching device path Lu Baolu
2023-06-23 16:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c8f6bf4-f0ad-2888-ada0-056c12647c41@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox