From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:55:30 +0900 Message-ID: <1d6601cdcee9$36ebd760$a4c38620$%kim@samsung.com> References: <002101cdc8a4$fc375990$f4a60cb0$%cho@samsung.com> <112e01cdc951$976699b0$c633cd10$%kim@samsung.com> <008601cdce20$1ccffb00$566ff100$%cho@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Content-language: ko Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: 'Rahul Sharma' , 'Cho KyongHo' Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, prathyush.k@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com, 'Subash Patel' , 'Sanghyun Lee' , rahul.sharma@samsung.com List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Rahul Sharma wrote: > > Hi Mr. Cho, > > We have verified the above patchset for following usecases on exynos5. > > 1) MFC decoding using Sysmmu_L and R. (with the bit Inversion fix) > 2) GSC operations. > 3) FIMD and MIXER (HDMI) as displays. > > Thanks for your effort. > Thanks for your test on board. [...] > >> > > > >> > > Looks good to me 1st~3rd patches. After quick review, I think, 1st > and 2nd > >> > > patches can go to upstream for v3.8 without any dependency. So I > will. > >> > > > >> > > The 3rd patch has a dependency with other driver changes (4th ~ > 12th), so it > >> > > should be sent to upstream with others. > >> > > > >> > > BTW since the 3rd patch touches many Samsung stuff in arch/arm/ so > I'd > >> > > prefer to take it in Samsung tree. If Joerg is ok on iommu/exynos > driver > >> > > changes for v3.8... > >> > > > >> > > Joerg, please let me know about iommu/exynos stuff so that I can > decide to > >> > > take 3rd patch or not for v3.8. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Hi, Kukjin Kim. > >> > > >> > I found that control bit fields of clock gating of System MMU of MFC > L/R is inversed. > >> > That is reported by Prathyush Kalashwaram. > >> > > >> > I will post v5 patchset that solves this. > >> > > >> > >> I did not posted v5 patchset. > >> Instead, I posted just the fix for the 03/12 patch mentioned above > >> as the reply to the 03/12 patch. > >> > > > > Hi, Joerg. > > > > I am waiting for your comment about the patchset. Same here. > > The latest version is v4. > > And a fix of [patch v4 03/12] mentioned above is posted as a reply. > > > > If you have any concern about the patches, please let me know > > If there is no reply, as I said, I will apply 1st and 2nd patches... Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.