From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
rajatja@google.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/24] iommu/io-pgtable: Remove non-strict quirk
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:46:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1f7de684-c646-cda9-b246-3712f046f2b0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX+VSr0TJabMBNqob0MkD2o0RBNp8E5QYNx0jFucW1Aew@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On 2021-08-24 14:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 2:24 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>> IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT was never a very comfortable fit, since it's
>> not a quirk of the pagetable format itself. Now that we have a more
>> appropriate way to convey non-strict unmaps, though, this last of the
>> non-quirk quirks can also go, and with the flush queue code also now
>> enforcing its own ordering we can have a lovely cleanup all round.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit a8e5f04458c4e496
> ("iommu/io-pgtable: Remove non-strict quirk") in iommu/next.
>
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s.c
>> @@ -700,14 +700,7 @@ static size_t __arm_v7s_unmap(struct arm_v7s_io_pgtable *data,
>> ARM_V7S_BLOCK_SIZE(lvl + 1));
>> ptep = iopte_deref(pte[i], lvl, data);
>> __arm_v7s_free_table(ptep, lvl + 1, data);
>> - } else if (iop->cfg.quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT) {
>> - /*
>> - * Order the PTE update against queueing the IOVA, to
>> - * guarantee that a flush callback from a different CPU
>> - * has observed it before the TLBIALL can be issued.
>> - */
>> - smp_wmb();
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (!gather->queued) {
>
> If CONFIG_IOMMU_API=n:
>
> error: ‘struct iommu_iotlb_gather’ has no member named ‘queued’
>
> This can be reproduced using e.g. shmobile_defconfig with
> CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S=y
>
>
>> io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova, blk_size);
>> }
>> iova += blk_size;
>
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c
>> @@ -638,14 +638,7 @@ static size_t __arm_lpae_unmap(struct arm_lpae_io_pgtable *data,
>> io_pgtable_tlb_flush_walk(iop, iova + i * size, size,
>> ARM_LPAE_GRANULE(data));
>> __arm_lpae_free_pgtable(data, lvl + 1, iopte_deref(pte, data));
>> - } else if (iop->cfg.quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT) {
>> - /*
>> - * Order the PTE update against queueing the IOVA, to
>> - * guarantee that a flush callback from a different CPU
>> - * has observed it before the TLBIALL can be issued.
>> - */
>> - smp_wmb();
>> - } else {
>> + } else if (!gather->queued) {
>
> If CONFIG_IOMMU_API=n:
>
> error: ‘struct iommu_iotlb_gather’ has no member named ‘queued’
>
> This can be reproduced using e.g. shmobile_defconfig with
> CONFIG_IOMMU_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE=y
>
>> io_pgtable_tlb_add_page(iop, gather, iova + i * size, size);
>> }
>>
>
> Perhaps "select IOMMU_API" should be added (moved from individual
> drivers) to both IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_ARMV7S and IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE?
> Or iommu_iotlb_gather.queued should not be accessed here, or the
> access wrapped into a static inline helper function with a dummy for
> the CONFIG_IOMMU_API=n case?
Those (and worse) should be fixed by this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/83672ee76f6405c82845a55c148fa836f56fbbc1.1629465282.git.robin.murphy@arm.com/
which apparently hasn't made it to -next yet.
Thanks,
Robin.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-11 12:21 [PATCH v4 00/24] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/24] iommu: Pull IOVA cookie management into the core Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/24] iommu/amd: Drop IOVA cookie management Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/24] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/24] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/24] iommu/exynos: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/24] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/24] iommu/mtk: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 08/24] iommu/rockchip: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 09/24] iommu/sprd: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 10/24] iommu/sun50i: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 11/24] iommu/virtio: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/24] iommu/dma: Unexport " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 13/24] iommu/dma: Remove redundant "!dev" checks Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 14/24] iommu: Indicate queued flushes via gather data Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 15/24] iommu/io-pgtable: Remove non-strict quirk Robin Murphy
2021-08-24 13:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-08-24 13:46 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 16/24] iommu: Introduce explicit type for non-strict DMA domains Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 17/24] iommu/amd: Prepare for multiple DMA domain types Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 18/24] iommu/arm-smmu: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 19/24] iommu/vt-d: " Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 20/24] iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 21/24] iommu: Expose DMA domain strictness via sysfs Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 22/24] iommu: Only log strictness for DMA domains Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 23/24] iommu: Merge strictness and domain type configs Robin Murphy
2021-08-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v4 24/24] iommu: Allow enabling non-strict mode dynamically Robin Murphy
2021-08-18 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 00/24] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness Joerg Roedel
2021-08-18 15:13 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-21 8:55 ` Sven Peter via iommu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1f7de684-c646-cda9-b246-3712f046f2b0@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox