From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: IOMMU: Tegra20: Add iommu_ops for GART driver Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:00:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20120123150048.GB6269@8bytes.org> References: <1325747509-29665-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> <1325747509-29665-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1325747509-29665-2-git-send-email-hdoyu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hiroshi DOYU Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linaro-mm-sig-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi, first, some questions about the GART on your platform. 1) How many GARTs are usually implemented? One GART per device or is there a single GART covering all devices, or a mix of both? 2) Are devices allowed to DMA outside of the remappable range or will this fail? Besides that I think IOMMU-API is not yet fully ready for GART-like drivers like this one. But I will merge it anyway to get things moving. But please answer or fix my objections first. On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 09:11:48AM +0200, Hiroshi DOYU wrote: > +static void gart_iommu_domain_destroy(struct iommu_domain *domain) > +{ > + struct gart_device *gart = domain->priv; > + > + spin_lock(&gart->client_lock); > + if (!list_empty(&gart->client)) { > + struct gart_client *c; > + > + list_for_each_entry(c, &gart->client, list) > + dev_err(gart->dev, > + "%s is still attached\n", dev_name(c->dev)); > + } > + spin_unlock(&gart->client_lock); gart needs a NULL check. When you create a domain and immediatly destroy it without ever attaching a device this code will dereference a NULL pointer. As a general improvement I suggest that you introduce a gart_domain structure and store it in domain->priv (assigned in domain_init) instead of using the hardware descriptor. > +static int gart_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, > + struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct gart_device *gart; > + struct gart_client *client, *c; > + int err = 0; > + > + gart = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent); > + if (!gart) > + return -EINVAL; > + domain->priv = gart; What happens when devices behind different GARTs are assigned to the same domain? domain->priv can only hold a pointer to one hardware GART. This can be solved by a 'struct gart_domain' holding a linked list to all gart_devices in this domain. Joerg