From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/omap: fix NULL pointer dereference Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:16:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20120224131638.GH2454@amd.com> References: <1329902086-13868-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20120223161109.GB2454@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Russell King , Tony Lindgren , Hiroshi DOYU , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Laurent Pinchart , linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > I guess these patches are 3.3 material? > > Yes. > > > How about tagging them for stable too? > > Good point. But it's only relevant for this 2nd patch (the NULL > pointer dereference fix), as the first one is a 3.3 regression. Let me > know if you want me to resend the 2nd one with the stable tag. Applied both and added stable-tag to the second patch. I'll send the pull-request when you guys also send me the correct fix for the outstanding initialization order issue on OMAP. Joerg -- AMD Operating System Research Center Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach General Managers: Alberto Bozzo Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632