From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] vt-d irq_remap_ops patchset Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:45:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20120401084506.GD21108@gmail.com> References: <1333133228-3134-1-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> <20120331081407.GC15958@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Suresh Siddha , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel , David Woodhouse , Alex Williamson List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Suresh Siddha wrote: > > > >> Ingo, > >> > >> Here is the Joerg's irq_remap_ops patchset updated for the latest -tip. > >> Simplified some of the naming conventions to follow the irq_remapping > >> terminology. There are still some "if (irq_remapping_enabled)" checks in > >> io_apic.c that I would like to roll into the new io_apic_ops. I will > >> look into that shortly. > > > > Just wondering, has this been tested on affected hardware, on > > top of latest -tip or so? I realize that most of these are > > clean-ups so they should not break anything, but checking would > > be worth it nevertheless. > > Yes, I tested those patches on my setups with Nehalem, > Westmere, and Sandbridge. ok, very good! Thanks, Ingo