From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] resources: set type of new resource returned by
	__request_region()
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:04:51 +0200
Message-ID: <20120521130451.GK2313@8bytes.org>
References: <20120518231238.31187.44571.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com>
	<20120518231832.31187.10630.stgit@bhelgaas.mtv.corp.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120518231832.31187.10630.stgit-1RhO1Y9PlrnlUACayq9hv/yj43VRqXoZVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/iommu>,
	<mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/>
List-Post: <mailto:iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu>,
	<mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:18:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Previously we returned a new struct resource with only IORESOURCE_BUSY
> set (and possibly IORESOURCE_MUXED or IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE), but no
> MEM/IO/etc. bits set.  The new resource should inherit the type of
> its parent.

Should it? What about IORESOURCE_WINDOW for example? Any particular
reason for this change to the interface of the __request_region()
function?


	Joerg