From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2] iommu/amd: Initialize device table after dma_ops Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 23:58:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20130303225828.GA22602@8bytes.org> References: <1362087590.2822.44.camel@lorien2> <1362265235.3768.156.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1362265235.3768.156.camel-nDn/Rdv9kqW9Jme8/bJn5UCKIB8iOfG2tUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Greg KH , LKML , stable , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, shuahkhan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, shuah.khan-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi Ben, On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:00:35PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > I'm not convinced about this backport, because the order of > initialisation already changed a lot after 3.2 and before the upstream > commit. So I'm going to wait for Joerg to confirm that this makes sense > before adding it to the patch queue. The patch looks good, it fixes a race condition during amd_iommu initialization. I'll also gave the backport a test to be sure it doesn't break anything. Thanks, Joerg