From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/exynos: Fix arm64 allmodconfig build Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:35:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20141215153529.GC11764@sirena.org.uk> References: <1418648413-32013-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> <548EDDCD.4060203@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EjZgaMZ/nZOUrj58" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <548EDDCD.4060203@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Koz=C5=82owski?= Cc: Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org --EjZgaMZ/nZOUrj58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:10:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Koz=C5=82owski wrote: > Hi Mark, > Few days ago I posted similar patch: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/5/268 > but no one have picked it up. > Anyway the fix of yours seems fine to me. I don't mind either way, it just seemed to be easier to report the bug with a patch. If Jeorg is busy perhaps it can go via the arm64 tree, the issue is triggered by the addition of the platform there? --EjZgaMZ/nZOUrj58 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUjv/BAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQmGEH/A3Wtgs43p4O4HXNCH23BR5q 08Um4rrDmhdLZp6yzsPHevUxxDrYwc03Tl0wd3QSN63Sw7wRR5dgJMedHDrBGYNG zk+Ko8ZItzMai25nDWmXjqxQnPaf3DdTCoz9HSGDQlKlWx2Ji65LYZjmPMO8rl4m S0lteS0nFOFS5hFv0saDjCPbC23vdM6TT6rrezYYOqljU/UcgbrLWnOdeDKVLJdi UmMWCNo30vDUSWOokfPidNulQoEj93wzAslRgnHAkacSU7XTwjKDkm8FiUQJdFPE rpSOK+uYUKXyCKMitlQwljYcbSOuMPac9RWcqnZk4iyss6P1jmdATDGZSjzU00Q= =H6Sg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EjZgaMZ/nZOUrj58--