From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Items required for kdump Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:06:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20150112160646.GF6343@8bytes.org> References: <1421046388-27925-1-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com> <1421046388-27925-3-git-send-email-zhen-hual@hp.com> <20150112152207.GC6343@8bytes.org> <20150112152919.GA16162@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150112152919.GA16162-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, tom.vaden-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, rwright-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lisa.mitchell-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, "Li, Zhen-Hua" , doug.hatch-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, ishii.hironobu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, billsumnerlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, li.zhang6-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org, dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:29:19AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Kdump has the notion of backup region. Where certain parts of old kernels > memory can be moved to a different location (first 640K on x86 as of now) > and new kernel can make use of this memory now. > > So we will have to just make sure that no parts of this old page table > fall into backup region. Uuh, looks like the 'iommu-with-kdump-issue' isn't complicated enough yet ;) Sadly, your above statement is true for all hardware-accessible data structures in IOMMU code. I think about how we can solve this, is there an easy way to allocate memory that is not in any backup region? Thanks, Joerg