From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: Warning from AMD IOMMU performance counters Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:57:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20160225145716.GA18581@8bytes.org> References: <56C798B8.6080009@redhat.com> <56CA69C7.3050508@iommu.org> <56CBB789.4020704@redhat.com> <56CC963A.1080607@redhat.com> <20160223175113.GA3711@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160223175113.GA3711-fF5Pk5pvG8Y@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Laura Abbott , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:51:13PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:26:18AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > > It was an issue with build signing on the testers machine. Once that was > > fixed it was confirmed that the patches did fix the issue. > > Btw, Joerg did come up with a minimal fix today: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160223121215.GA31151-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org > > in case you want to run it instead of that big patchset which is still > being reviewed... I just queued that small fix and tagged it for stable. Suravees patches are too intrusive for that and better suited for v4.6. Joerg