From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Wei Yang
<richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: reduce extra first level entry in iommu->domains
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 21:43:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160525214359.GA4132@vultr.guest> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57457BCD.7080909-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>On 25/05/16 00:06, Wei Yang wrote:
>>Hi, Joerg
>>
>>Not sure whether you think this calculation is correct.
>>
>>If I missed something for this " + 1" in your formula, I am glad to hear your
>>explanation. So that I could learn something from you :-)
>
>I'm not familiar enough with this aspect of the driver to confirm whether the
>change is appropriate or not, but it does seem worth noting that using
>DIV_ROUND_UP would be an even neater approach.
>
Hi, Robin,
Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I agree DIV_ROUND_UP would make the code more easy to read.
I have thought about using DIV_ROUND_UP, while from the definition
DIV_ROUND_UP use operation "/", and ALIGN use bit operation. So the change in
my patch chooses the second one and tries to keep the efficiency.
>Robin.
>
>>Have a good day~
>>
>>On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 02:41:51AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>In commit <8bf478163e69> ("iommu/vt-d: Split up iommu->domains array"), it
>>>it splits iommu->domains in two levels. Each first level contains 256
>>>entries of second level. In case of the ndomains is exact a multiple of
>>>256, it would have one more extra first level entry for current
>>>implementation.
>>>
>>>This patch refines this calculation to reduce the extra first level entry.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>---
>>>drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 ++--
>>>1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>>index e3061d3..2204ca4 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>>@@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ static int iommu_init_domains(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>>- size = ((ndomains >> 8) + 1) * sizeof(struct dmar_domain **);
>>>+ size = (ALIGN(ndomains, 256) >> 8) * sizeof(struct dmar_domain **);
>>> iommu->domains = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>> if (iommu->domains) {
>>>@@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ static void disable_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>>static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>>>{
>>> if ((iommu->domains) && (iommu->domain_ids)) {
>>>- int elems = (cap_ndoms(iommu->cap) >> 8) + 1;
>>>+ int elems = ALIGN(cap_ndoms(iommu->cap), 256) >> 8;
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < elems; i++)
>>>--
>>>1.7.9.5
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-25 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-21 2:41 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: reduce extra first level entry in iommu->domains Wei Yang
[not found] ` <1463798511-4015-1-git-send-email-richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-24 23:06 ` Wei Yang
2016-05-25 10:17 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <57457BCD.7080909-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-25 21:43 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2016-05-26 10:11 ` Robin Murphy
2016-05-26 22:34 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <20160524230655.GA28550-yrDqe6+Pica9sAcnBtTtJQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-15 11:39 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-06-16 22:51 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160525214359.GA4132@vultr.guest \
--to=richard.weiyang-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).