From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: narrow the search range by iterating on current bus
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:51:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160928195141.GA18803@vultr.guest> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160818230026.GA2631-yrDqe6+Pica9sAcnBtTtJQ@public.gmane.org>
Ping~ Hope you like it :-)
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:00:26PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>Hi, Alex & Bjorn,
>
>I tried to measure the effect of the improvement and looks good.
>
> +---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
> |Platform Info |Before(ns) |After(ns) |Improvement|
> +---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
> |76 pci devices |1846600 |100289 |94.5% |
> +---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
> |16 pci devices |46931 |23189 |53.0% |
> +---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
>
>Below is my raw result and the code to measure the time used. Willing to hear
>from you :-)
>
>Raw Data collected on a machine with 32 pci devices in the system.
>==================
>total time 46931 with 32 devices 1466.59 each
>total time 23189 with 32 devices 724.656 each
>
>Raw Data collected on a machine with 76 pci devices in the system.
>==================
>total time 1846600 with 152 devices 12148.7 each
>total time 100289 with 152 devices 659.796 each
>
>Script and diff to kernel to extract the raw data.
>==================
>awk ' {x += $9; y++} END {print "total time " x " with " y " devices " x/y " each"}' narrow.orig
>
>diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>index d420d94d..63cda3d 100644
>--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>@@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
> struct pci_bus *bus;
> struct iommu_group *group = NULL;
> u64 devfns[4] = { 0 };
>+ struct timespec ts1, ts2;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!dev_is_pci(dev)))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>@@ -782,7 +783,11 @@ struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
> * Look for existing groups on device aliases. If we alias another
> * device or another device aliases us, use the same group.
> */
>+ getnstimeofday(&ts1);
> group = get_pci_alias_group(pdev, (unsigned long *)devfns);
>+ getnstimeofday(&ts2);
>+ dev_info(dev, "ywtest: %s: get_pci_alias_group spend %lu sec %lu nsec\n",
>+ __func__, ts2.tv_sec - ts1.tv_sec, ts2.tv_nsec - ts1.tv_nsec);
> if (group)
> return group;
>
>@@ -791,7 +796,11 @@ struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
> * slot and aliases of those functions, if any. No need to clear
> * the search bitmap, the tested devfns are still valid.
> */
>+ getnstimeofday(&ts1);
> group = get_pci_function_alias_group(pdev, (unsigned long *)devfns);
>+ getnstimeofday(&ts2);
>+ dev_info(dev, "ywtest: %s: get_pci_function_alias_group spend %lu sec %lu nsec\n",
>+ __func__, ts2.tv_sec - ts1.tv_sec, ts2.tv_nsec - ts1.tv_nsec);
> if (group)
> return group;
>
>On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:03:17PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>>On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:01:32AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>>On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:52:59 +0000
>>>Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> According to the comments and code, get_pci_function_alias_group() and
>>>> get_pci_alias_group() do the search on the same pci bus. This means we can
>>>> just iterate on the bus the pci device attaches to.
>>>>
>>>> This patch narrows the search range by just iterating on the current bus
>>>> and fix one typo in comment.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>> index 3000051..0338a81 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>> @@ -643,17 +643,15 @@ static struct iommu_group *get_pci_function_alias_group(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> if (!pdev->multifunction || pci_acs_enabled(pdev, REQ_ACS_FLAGS))
>>>> return NULL;
>>>>
>>>> - for_each_pci_dev(tmp) {
>>>> - if (tmp == pdev || tmp->bus != pdev->bus ||
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &pdev->bus->devices, bus_list) {
>>>
>>>I believe this was using for_each_pci_dev() exactly because it takes a
>>>reference to the device and therefore we can use it to get a reference
>>>to the group. How do you justify removing these reference semantics?
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>
>>Alex,
>>
>>With some investigation, I believe these reference are important. Thanks for
>>reminding.
>>
>>Well, the pci_dev and the bus->devices list are protected by pci_bus_sem and
>>we have already had a function to walk the pci bus safely by holding this
>>semaphore. While the pci_walk_bus() will continue the process when it sees a
>>bridge device.
>>
>>So I create another patch to export a function to walk just on the local bus
>>and then calling this from get_pci_function_alias_group() and
>>get_pci_alias_group().
>>
>>Since this change is related to pci subsystem, I include Bjorn.
>>
>>Hi, Bjorn,
>>
>>Haven't seen you for a long time. Hope you would like the idea.
>>
>>>Alex
>>>
>>>> + if (tmp == pdev ||
>>>> PCI_SLOT(tmp->devfn) != PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) ||
>>>> pci_acs_enabled(tmp, REQ_ACS_FLAGS))
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> group = get_pci_alias_group(tmp, devfns);
>>>> - if (group) {
>>>> - pci_dev_put(tmp);
>>>> + if (group)
>>>> return group;
>>>> - }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> @@ -681,23 +679,19 @@ static struct iommu_group *get_pci_alias_group(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> if (group)
>>>> return group;
>>>>
>>>> - for_each_pci_dev(tmp) {
>>>> - if (tmp == pdev || tmp->bus != pdev->bus)
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &pdev->bus->devices, bus_list) {
>>>> + if (tmp == pdev)
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> /* We alias them or they alias us */
>>>> if (pci_devs_are_dma_aliases(pdev, tmp)) {
>>>> group = get_pci_alias_group(tmp, devfns);
>>>> - if (group) {
>>>> - pci_dev_put(tmp);
>>>> + if (group)
>>>> return group;
>>>> - }
>>>>
>>>> group = get_pci_function_alias_group(tmp, devfns);
>>>> - if (group) {
>>>> - pci_dev_put(tmp);
>>>> + if (group)
>>>> return group;
>>>> - }
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -794,7 +788,7 @@ struct iommu_group *pci_device_group(struct device *dev)
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Look for existing groups on non-isolated functions on the same
>>>> - * slot and aliases of those funcions, if any. No need to clear
>>>> + * slot and aliases of those functions, if any. No need to clear
>>>> * the search bitmap, the tested devfns are still valid.
>>>> */
>>>> group = get_pci_function_alias_group(pdev, (unsigned long *)devfns);
>>
>>--
>>Wei Yang
>>Help you, Help me
>
>--
>Wei Yang
>Help you, Help me
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-28 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-28 14:52 [PATCH] iommu: narrow the search range by iterating on current bus Wei Yang
[not found] ` <1469717579-8244-1-git-send-email-richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-28 15:01 ` Alex Williamson
[not found] ` <20160728090132.42c6ebc1-1yVPhWWZRC1BDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-05 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: add a function to walk on local bus Wei Yang
[not found] ` <1470404867-26783-1-git-send-email-richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-05 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu: narrow the search range by iterating on current bus Wei Yang
2016-08-05 14:03 ` [PATCH] " Wei Yang
[not found] ` <20160805140317.GA26921-yrDqe6+Pica9sAcnBtTtJQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-18 23:00 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <20160818230026.GA2631-yrDqe6+Pica9sAcnBtTtJQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-28 19:51 ` Wei Yang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160928195141.GA18803@vultr.guest \
--to=richard.weiyang-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jroedel-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).