From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] iommu/arm-smmu: Fixes for 4.9
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161103162943.GS3541@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0dbf2665-4292-d49a-b9e7-688bcdf29c6e-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> But bus_set_iommu() is already checking whether another SMMU (in this
> case) has probed, by virtue of bus->iommu_ops being non-NULL, and
> returning without doing anything if so. What's the value of adding a
> whole bunch more code to effectively duplicate that in a less elegant
> manner?
No, bus_set_iommu() checks whether there is _any_ other IOMMU already
registered. This doesn't need to be an smmu. So I think the return value
of bus_set_iommu shouldn't be generally ignored.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-28 16:01 [GIT PULL] iommu/arm-smmu: Fixes for 4.9 Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20161028160148.GD1076-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 15:33 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20161103153303.GA837-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 16:00 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20161103160006.GS22791-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 16:14 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <20161103161407.GR3541-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 16:22 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <0dbf2665-4292-d49a-b9e7-688bcdf29c6e-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 16:29 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
[not found] ` <20161103162943.GS3541-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 16:57 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <a6ded15c-5eea-70b8-61a1-b40873af8699-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-03 17:29 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161103162943.GS3541@8bytes.org \
--to=joro-zlv9swrftaidnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).