From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:58:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20161110105806.GA20209@red-moon> References: <20161109141948.19244-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tomasz Nowicki , Hanjun Guo , Jon Masters , Eric Auger , Sinan Kaya , Nate Watterson , Prem Mallappa , Dennis Chen , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Hi Rafael, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: > > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506 > > I don't see anything objectionable in this series. Thank you very much ! > Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail. Apart from patch 1, patch 7 (and patch 16 that adds on top of it) requires an ack from an ACPI core perspective. acpi_dma_configure() should not affect x86/ia64 systems at all so those patches should not really be controversial (patch 16 adds an IORT hook into acpi_dma_configure() that is a nop by design on anything other than ARM64), please let me know if they are ok. Thank you again for your time, Lorenzo