From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:07:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20161115140751.GA16710@red-moon> References: <20161109141948.19244-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <20161115101257.GB16261@red-moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Marc Zyngier , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Will Deacon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PCI , Sinan Kaya , "open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" , Dennis Chen , Tomasz Nowicki , Prem Mallappa , Jon Masters List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:04:09PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Hi Lorenzo, > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi > >> wrote: > >> > This patch series is v7 of a previous posting: > >> > > >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/18/506 > >> > >> I don't see anything objectionable in this series. > >> > >> Please let me know which patches in particular to look at in detail. > > > > Are patches 7 and consequently 16 (that builds on top of 7) ok with > > you ? They should be equivalent to nop on anything other than ARM64 > > but they touch ACPI core so they require an ACK if they are ok please. > > Yes, they are. Please feel free to add my ACKs to those or I will > send them separately later today. Thank you very much, I will add them to v8 that should be final, I will send it when the dust has settled on patch 4, which looks like the last bit to sort out (we may not even need a v8 at all). Thanks ! Lorenzo