From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] IOVA allocation improvements for iommu-dma Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:33:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20170331143329.GQ7266@8bytes.org> References: <20170331124051.GI8967@arm.com> <10f9621a-41ca-bb3d-0e49-a2827022f608@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10f9621a-41ca-bb3d-0e49-a2827022f608-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: Will Deacon , damm+renesas-yzvPICuk2ACczHhG9Qg4qA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, sunil.kovvuri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 02:13:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > I was assuming this would go through the IOMMU tree if there were no > problems and the feedback was good, and that would seem to be the case. > I'm pleasantly surprised that this series doesn't even conflict at all > with my other iommu-dma changes already queued - I've just checked that > it still applies cleanly to the current iommu/next as-is. Yes, makes sense. Can you please resend it with the review and tested-tags added? I queue it then. Thanks, Joerg