From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] IOMMU group cleanup Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:21:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20170811152124.GH30515@8bytes.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, hdoyu-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 01:12:34PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Hi all, > > Prompted by some discussion around the questionable usefulness of > iommu_present() for SoC topologies, I took a look at what was left to > finish off the intention of making groups mandatory. Turns out it > wasn't much, so here it is. As well as the general rationalisation > aspect, between this and the probe-deferral changes in 4.12, we should > now be able to rely on the presence of a group unambiguously indicating > whether a given device is associated with an IOMMU or not. > > Robin. > > Robin Murphy (4): > iommu/msm: Add iommu_group support > iommu/tegra-smmu: Add iommu_group support > iommu/tegra-gart: Add iommu_group support > iommu: Finish making iommu_group support mandatory Applied, thanks Robin.