iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm
	<linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org"
	<iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [pull] iommu: qcom_iommu for v4.14
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:42:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170815154232.GB25618@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGuNqQtJBhLAFu3NdUAjKJrVvR9WtHL-eCRN0H1Di6_4mQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:27:36AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
> 
> These patches have been on list for quite some time now.  The bindings
> have r-b from Rob Herring, and the patch touching arm-smmu has Will's
> a-b.  And all the review comments on the driver patches have been
> addressed (despite no one stepping up w/ a r-b tag).  Please consider
> merging this pull request for v4.14

Okay, I applied it, not from this pull-request, but from your last
post. Some comments for the future below.

> Rob Clark (3):
>       Docs: dt: document qcom iommu bindings

This patch has no commit-message. Usually that is a reason for me to
reject the patch. I applied it anyway this time because it has an
Reviewed-By from a device-tree maintainer, and if its fine for him, I
can live with it.

For the other three patches I edited the Subject line to match the
convention of the iommu-tree, which is "iommu/<driver>: _Capital Letter_...

The patches below are now named:

>       iommu: arm-smmu: split out register defines
        iommu/arm-smmu: Split out register defines

>       iommu: add qcom_iommu
        iommu/qcom: Add qcom_iommu
> 
> Stanimir Varbanov (1):
>       iommu: qcom: initialize secure page table
        iommu/qcom: Initialize secure page table

Please follow that convention for future patches.


Thanks,

	Joerg

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-15 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-13 14:27 [pull] iommu: qcom_iommu for v4.14 Rob Clark
2017-08-13 14:29 ` Rob Clark
     [not found] ` <CAF6AEGuNqQtJBhLAFu3NdUAjKJrVvR9WtHL-eCRN0H1Di6_4mQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-08-15 15:42   ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2017-08-15 16:52     ` Rob Clark
2017-08-15 20:59       ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170815154232.GB25618@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro-zlv9swrftaidnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robdclark-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).