From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [pull] iommu: qcom_iommu for v4.14 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:42:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20170815154232.GB25618@8bytes.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Rob Clark Cc: linux-arm-msm , "iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org" , Will Deacon List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 10:27:36AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > These patches have been on list for quite some time now. The bindings > have r-b from Rob Herring, and the patch touching arm-smmu has Will's > a-b. And all the review comments on the driver patches have been > addressed (despite no one stepping up w/ a r-b tag). Please consider > merging this pull request for v4.14 Okay, I applied it, not from this pull-request, but from your last post. Some comments for the future below. > Rob Clark (3): > Docs: dt: document qcom iommu bindings This patch has no commit-message. Usually that is a reason for me to reject the patch. I applied it anyway this time because it has an Reviewed-By from a device-tree maintainer, and if its fine for him, I can live with it. For the other three patches I edited the Subject line to match the convention of the iommu-tree, which is "iommu/: _Capital Letter_... The patches below are now named: > iommu: arm-smmu: split out register defines iommu/arm-smmu: Split out register defines > iommu: add qcom_iommu iommu/qcom: Add qcom_iommu > > Stanimir Varbanov (1): > iommu: qcom: initialize secure page table iommu/qcom: Initialize secure page table Please follow that convention for future patches. Thanks, Joerg