From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/tegra: Add IOMMU group support Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:57:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20171212145717.05d49e60@t450s.home> References: <20171127095055.21486-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20171127095343.GA21584@ulmo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171127095343.GA21584@ulmo> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Joerg Roedel , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Mikko Perttunen , Jonathan Hunter List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:53:43 +0100 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:50:53AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > From: Thierry Reding > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > Both patches in this series are built-time dependent and therefore it > > would be easiest if they went in via the same tree (either the IOMMU > > tree, or the Tegra tree with your Acked-by on patch 1). Alternatively, > > I could put patch two in a separate branch and provide a stable tag for > > you to pull in, in order to resolve the dependency. > > > > Do you have any preference? > > > > Thierry > > > > Thierry Reding (2): > > iommu/tegra: Allow devices to be grouped > > memory: tegra: Create SMMU display groups > > I just realized that these are actually in the wrong order. The second > patch adds the data fields that the first patch uses. Depending on which > merge strategy you prefer I can reorder when applying or resend in the > correct order. Hi Thierry, Joerg is on paternity leave through the end of the year and I'm handling the IOMMU tree in the interim. Given the low traffic on iommu/tegra-smmu.c, I'm going to suggest we take the merge path through the Tegra tree and I'll Ack the first patch to help that along. Please do the necessary re-order when applying. Thanks, Alex