From: Scott Wood <swood-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves"
<lgoncalv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Clark Williams <williams-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
Scott Wood <swood-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] iommu/amd: Avoid locking get_irq_table() from atomic context
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:36:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180214233628.29560-1-swood@redhat.com> (raw)
get_irq_table() previously acquired amd_iommu_devtable_lock which is not
a raw lock, and thus cannot be acquired from atomic context on
PREEMPT_RT. Many calls to modify_irte*() come from atomic context due to
the IRQ desc->lock, as does amd_iommu_update_ga() due to the preemption
disabling in vcpu_load/put().
The only difference between calling get_irq_table() and reading from
irq_lookup_table[] directly, other than the lock acquisition and
amd_iommu_rlookup_table[] check, is if the table entry is unpopulated,
which should never happen when looking up a devid that came from an
irq_2_irte struct, as get_irq_table() would have already been called on
that devid during irq_remapping_alloc().
The lock acquisition is not needed in these cases because entries in
irq_lookup_table[] never change once non-NULL -- nor would the
amd_iommu_devtable_lock usage in get_irq_table() provide meaningful
protection if they did, since it's released before using the looked up
table in the get_irq_table() caller.
Rename the old get_irq_table() to alloc_irq_table(), and create a new
lockless get_irq_table() to be used in non-allocating contexts that WARNs
if it doesn't find what it's looking for.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
v2: Added new get_irq_table() with WARNs rather than accessing
irq_lookup_table[] directly.
---
drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index e4026133aa1d..5d41e0733cb3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -3594,7 +3594,22 @@ static void set_dte_irq_entry(u16 devid, struct irq_remap_table *table)
amd_iommu_dev_table[devid].data[2] = dte;
}
-static struct irq_remap_table *get_irq_table(u16 devid, bool ioapic)
+static struct irq_remap_table *get_irq_table(u16 devid)
+{
+ struct irq_remap_table *table;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(!amd_iommu_rlookup_table[devid],
+ "%s: no iommu for devid %x\n", __func__, devid))
+ return NULL;
+
+ table = irq_lookup_table[devid];
+ if (WARN_ONCE(!table, "%s: no table for devid %x\n", __func__, devid))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return table;
+}
+
+static struct irq_remap_table *alloc_irq_table(u16 devid, bool ioapic)
{
struct irq_remap_table *table = NULL;
struct amd_iommu *iommu;
@@ -3681,7 +3696,7 @@ static int alloc_irq_index(u16 devid, int count, bool align)
if (!iommu)
return -ENODEV;
- table = get_irq_table(devid, false);
+ table = alloc_irq_table(devid, false);
if (!table)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -3732,7 +3747,7 @@ static int modify_irte_ga(u16 devid, int index, struct irte_ga *irte,
if (iommu == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
- table = get_irq_table(devid, false);
+ table = get_irq_table(devid);
if (!table)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3765,7 +3780,7 @@ static int modify_irte(u16 devid, int index, union irte *irte)
if (iommu == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
- table = get_irq_table(devid, false);
+ table = get_irq_table(devid);
if (!table)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3789,7 +3804,7 @@ static void free_irte(u16 devid, int index)
if (iommu == NULL)
return;
- table = get_irq_table(devid, false);
+ table = get_irq_table(devid);
if (!table)
return;
@@ -4107,7 +4122,7 @@ static int irq_remapping_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
return ret;
if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_IOAPIC) {
- if (get_irq_table(devid, true))
+ if (alloc_irq_table(devid, true))
index = info->ioapic_pin;
else
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -4390,7 +4405,7 @@ int amd_iommu_update_ga(int cpu, bool is_run, void *data)
if (!iommu)
return -ENODEV;
- irt = get_irq_table(devid, false);
+ irt = get_irq_table(devid);
if (!irt)
return -ENODEV;
--
2.14.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-14 23:36 Scott Wood [this message]
[not found] ` <20180214233628.29560-1-swood-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-15 11:04 ` [PATCH v2] iommu/amd: Avoid locking get_irq_table() from atomic context Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180214233628.29560-1-swood@redhat.com \
--to=swood-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lgoncalv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=williams-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox