From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use generic swiotlb_ops Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:35:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20180315133530.GA17956@lst.de> References: <20180314175213.20256-1-hch@lst.de> <20180314175213.20256-5-hch@lst.de> <20180315115426.GB16210@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tom Lendacky , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Muli Ben-Yehuda , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, David Woodhouse , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:52:14PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Yeah, I know that the standard defines it, but that doesn't mean it makes > sense. At least not to me. It makes sense in that it logically is a boolean but we only want to allocate 1 bit for it, unlike the normal ABI allocations of at least a byte. Either way, tell me what you want it changed to, and I'll do it.