From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: use generic dma-direct and swiotlb code for x86 V3 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:28:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20180319152840.GA28041@lst.de> References: <20180319103826.12853-1-hch@lst.de> <20180319152737.GK1110@char.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180319152737.GK1110@char.us.oracle.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Christoph Hellwig , x86@kernel.org, Tom Lendacky , David Woodhouse , Muli Ben-Yehuda , Jon Mason , Joerg Roedel , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:27:37AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this series switches the x86 code the the dma-direct implementation > > for direct (non-iommu) dma and the generic swiotlb ops. This includes > > getting rid of the special ops for the AMD memory encryption case and > > the STA2x11 SOC. The generic implementations are based on the x86 > > code, so they provide the same functionality. > > I need to test this on my baremertal and Xen setup - and I lost your > git repo URL - any chance you mention point out to me so I can > kick of a build? git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git dma-direct-x86