From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: swiotlb_{alloc,free}_buffer should depend on CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:03:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20180324170351.GA511@lst.de> References: <20180323174930.17767-1-hch@lst.de> <20180323185707.GD25533@char.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180323185707.GD25533-he5eyhs8q0BAdwtm4QZOy9BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:57:07PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:49:30PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Otherwise we might get unused symbol warnings for configs that built > > swiotlb.c only for use by xen-swiotlb.c and that don't otherwise select > > CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_OPS, which is possible on arm. > > > > Fixes: 16e73adbca76 ("dma/swiotlb: Remove swiotlb_{alloc,free}_coherent()") > > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > Alternatively could we set the Kconfig to slect DMA_DIRECT_OPS? IFF we build swiotlb.c only for xen-swiotlb we don't need DMA_DIRECT_OPS. IF you are fine with just requring it as well that would be doable nicely only if we consolidate to a single defintion of CONFIG_SWIOTLB instead of one per architecture. Which is something we should do anyway, so I'll look into it once I get some time.