From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/23] kernel/watchdog: Introduce a struct for NMI watchdog operations Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:41:41 +1000 Message-ID: <20180613174141.539fc6c1@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1528851463-21140-1-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <1528851463-21140-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1528851463-21140-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ricardo Neri Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Ashok Raj , Borislav Petkov , Tony Luck , "Ravi V. Shankar" , x86@kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Pan , Don Zickus , Michael Ellerman , Frederic Weisbecker , Babu Moger , "David S. Miller" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Mathieu Desnoyers , Masami List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:57:32 -0700 Ricardo Neri wrote: > Instead of exposing individual functions for the operations of the NMI > watchdog, define a common interface that can be used across multiple > implementations. > > The struct nmi_watchdog_ops is defined for such operations. These initial > definitions include the enable, disable, start, stop, and cleanup > operations. > > Only a single NMI watchdog can be used in the system. The operations of > this NMI watchdog are accessed via the new variable nmi_wd_ops. This > variable is set to point the operations of the first NMI watchdog that > initializes successfully. Even though at this moment, the only available > NMI watchdog is the perf-based hardlockup detector. More implementations > can be added in the future. Cool, this looks pretty nice at a quick glance. sparc and powerpc at least have their own NMI watchdogs, it would be good to have those converted as well. Is hpet a cross platform thing, or just x86? We should avoid proliferation of files under kernel/ I think, so with these watchdog driver structs then maybe implementations could go in drivers/ or arch/ Thanks, Nick