From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: pdaly-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support to use Last level cache
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:52:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180615165232.GE2202@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180615105329.26800-1-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Hi Vivek,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 04:23:29PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Qualcomm SoCs have an additional level of cache called as
> System cache or Last level cache[1]. This cache sits right
> before the DDR, and is tightly coupled with the memory
> controller.
> The cache is available to all the clients present in the
> SoC system. The clients request their slices from this system
> cache, make it active, and can then start using it. For these
> clients with smmu, to start using the system cache for
> dma buffers and related page tables [2], few of the memory
> attributes need to be set accordingly.
> This change makes the related memory Outer-Shareable, and
> updates the MAIR with necessary protection.
>
> The MAIR attribute requirements are:
> Inner Cacheablity = 0
> Outer Cacheablity = 1, Write-Back Write Allocate
> Outer Shareablity = 1
Hmm, so is this cache coherent with the CPU or not? Why don't normal
non-cacheable mappings allocated in the LLC by default?
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index f7a96bcf94a6..8058e7205034 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
> struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */
> spinlock_t cb_lock; /* Serialises ATS1* ops and TLB syncs */
> struct iommu_domain domain;
> + bool has_sys_cache;
> };
>
> struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
> @@ -862,6 +863,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_domain_context(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>
> if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK)
> pgtbl_cfg.quirks = IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_DMA;
> + if (smmu_domain->has_sys_cache)
> + pgtbl_cfg.quirks |= IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_SYS_CACHE;
>
> smmu_domain->smmu = smmu;
> pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(fmt, &pgtbl_cfg, smmu_domain);
> @@ -1477,6 +1480,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
> *(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED);
> return 0;
> + case DOMAIN_ATTR_USE_SYS_CACHE:
> + *((int *)data) = smmu_domain->has_sys_cache;
> + return 0;
I really don't like exposing this to clients directly like this,
particularly as there aren't any in-tree users. I would prefer that we
provide a way for the io-pgtable code to have its MAIR values overridden
so that all non-coherent DMA ends up using the system cache.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-15 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-15 10:53 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support to use Last level cache Vivek Gautam
[not found] ` <20180615105329.26800-1-vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-15 16:52 ` Will Deacon [this message]
[not found] ` <20180615165232.GE2202-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-15 17:12 ` Jordan Crouse
2018-06-19 8:34 ` Vivek Gautam
[not found] ` <CAFp+6iFm29ufb2Pr7Gb-2O_aN3GQLH4rcyWhbQGZ3QiwCC8vPg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-06-27 16:37 ` Will Deacon
[not found] ` <20180627163749.GA8729-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-07-24 9:43 ` Vivek Gautam
[not found] ` <CAFp+6iHnA1Jj8wKO08YYEBKVF2_3oEuOQOcW2boL=AYZ9+b=UA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-09-19 19:35 ` Jordan Crouse
2018-09-20 10:25 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-20 11:41 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-09-28 13:19 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-05 5:25 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-10-23 4:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-10-24 17:48 ` Vivek Gautam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-04 11:01 Vivek Gautam
2018-12-04 15:21 ` Robin Murphy
[not found] ` <99682bd2-1ca6-406a-890c-b34c25a1b2b3-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2018-12-07 9:24 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-12-13 3:50 ` Tomasz Figa
[not found] ` <CAAFQd5C+BygjdBhBOsiBW=4kOgC0a=V8s9om6jqa6yzmn0TEWw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-02 7:22 ` Vivek Gautam
[not found] ` <CAFp+6iE7U3HCJwHkeL9A4DXUVryt13YxDCYfBDxcSSM2Z_vqcg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-01-02 7:52 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180615165232.GE2202@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pdaly-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).