From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] kernel/dma/direct: refine dma_direct_alloc zone selection Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20180823052604.GB14388@lst.de> References: <20180730163824.10064-1-hch@lst.de> <20180730163824.10064-3-hch@lst.de> <7177553cdb5cd1b968f653a52d7e88bd71aae4d8.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20180822065856.GC19284@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Fenghua Yu , Tony Luck , linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Paul Mackerras , Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:01:45AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > The general scheme that architectures should implement is: > > > > ZONE_DMA: Any memory below a magic threshold that is lower than > > 32-bit. Only enabled if actually required (usually > > either 24-bit for ISA, or some other weird architecture > > specific value like 32-bit for S/390) > > It should have been ZONE_ISA_DMA :-) For most of these use cases it should have been indeed, and that would avoid a lot of confusion where people use GFP_DMA just because they do DMA. Anyway, switching powerpc to this scheme would be great, but I don't think it is required - GFP_KERNEL will silently fall back to ZONE_DMA, so except for an additional GFP_DMA fallback allocation when the GFP_KERNEL one fails the code should just work.