From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size() Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:37:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20190131143723.GA32329@lst.de> References: <20190130164007.26497-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20190130164007.26497-4-joro@8bytes.org> <20190131104129.GA9241@lst.de> <20190131130127.GP32526@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190131130127.GP32526@8bytes.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Roedel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Jens Axboe , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jfehlig@suse.com, jon.grimm@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Sorry for not noticing last time, but since 5.0 we keep all non-fast > > path DMA mapping interfaces out of line, so this should move to > > kernel/dma/mapping.c. > > Okay, attached patch does that. It applies on-top of this patch-set. > > Michael, feel free to either apply this on-top of the patch-set or merge > the diff into patch 3, whatever you prefer. Looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig I'd prefer it to be squashed if possible.