From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dma-direct: do not allocate a single page from CMA area
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:37:43 +0100
Message-ID: <20190207053743.GA14373@lst.de>
References: <20190115215140.1545-1-nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
	<20190204082307.GA5916@lst.de>
	<20190205230514.GA21515@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
	<20190206070726.GE23392@lst.de>
	<20190207022848.GA5581@Asurada-Nvidia.nvidia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190207022848.GA5581-eY6anlDvssOc8mJX2Sq4F8VPkgjIgRvpAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/iommu>,
	<mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/>
List-Post: <mailto:iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu>,
	<mailto:iommu-request-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org

On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 06:28:49PM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> So we will keep allocating single pages in dev->cma_area if it's
> present, in order to address your previous concern?

Yes.