Re: [PATCH v2 11/19] iommu/vt-d: Replace Intel specific PASID allocator with IOASID

Auger Eric
2019-04-27T08:41:15Z

On 4/26/19 11:01 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:04:01 +0200
> Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jacob,
>>
>> On 4/24/19 1:31 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>> Make use of generic IOASID code to manage PASID allocation,
>>> free, and lookup.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 9 ++++-----
>>> drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 36
>>> ------------------------------------ drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c |
>>> 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 4 files changed, 29
>>> insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>>> index 6f07f3b..7f92009 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>>> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ config INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>>> bool "Support for Shared Virtual Memory with Intel IOMMU"
>>> depends on INTEL_IOMMU && X86
>>> select PCI_PASID
>>> + select IOASID
>>> select MMU_NOTIFIER
>>> help
>>> Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) provides a facility for
>>> devices diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>> b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index ec6f22d..785330a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>>> @@ -5153,7 +5153,7 @@ static void auxiliary_unlink_device(struct
>>> dmar_domain *domain, domain->auxd_refcnt--;
>>>
>>> if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
>>> - intel_pasid_free_id(domain->default_pasid);
>>> + ioasid_free(domain->default_pasid);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>>> @@ -5171,9 +5171,8 @@ static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct
>>> dmar_domain *domain, if (domain->default_pasid <= 0) {
>>> int pasid;
>>>
>>> - pasid = intel_pasid_alloc_id(domain, PASID_MIN,
>>> -
>>> pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)),
>>> - GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + pasid = ioasid_alloc(NULL, PASID_MIN,
>>> pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) - 1,
>>> + domain);
>>> if (pasid <= 0) {
>> ioasid_t is a uint and returns INVALID_IOASID on error. Wouldn't it be
>> simpler to make ioasid_alloc return an int?
> Well, I think we still want the full uint range - 1(INVALID_IOASID).
> Intel uses 20bit but I think SMMUs use 32 bits for streamID? I
> should just check
> if (pasid == INVALID_IOASID) {
Jean-Philippe may correct me but SMMU uses 20b SubstreamId which is a
superset of PASIDs. StreamId is 32b.
>
>>> pr_err("Can't allocate default pasid\n");
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> @@ -5210,7 +5209,7 @@ static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct
>>> dmar_domain *domain, spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
>>> if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
>>> - intel_pasid_free_id(domain->default_pasid);
>>> + ioasid_free(domain->default_pasid);
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
>>> b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c index 5b1d3be..d339e8f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
>>> @@ -26,42 +26,6 @@
>>> */
>>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pasid_lock);
>>> u32 intel_pasid_max_id = PASID_MAX;
>>> -static DEFINE_IDR(pasid_idr);
>>> -
>>> -int intel_pasid_alloc_id(void *ptr, int start, int end, gfp_t gfp)
>>> -{
>>> - int ret, min, max;
>>> -
>>> - min = max_t(int, start, PASID_MIN);
>>> - max = min_t(int, end, intel_pasid_max_id);
>>> -
>>> - WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
>>> - idr_preload(gfp);
>>> - spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
>>> - ret = idr_alloc(&pasid_idr, ptr, min, max, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>> - spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
>>> - idr_preload_end();
>>> -
>>> - return ret;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -void intel_pasid_free_id(int pasid)
>>> -{
>>> - spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
>>> - idr_remove(&pasid_idr, pasid);
>>> - spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -void *intel_pasid_lookup_id(int pasid)
>>> -{
>>> - void *p;
>>> -
>>> - spin_lock(&pasid_lock);
>>> - p = idr_find(&pasid_idr, pasid);
>>> - spin_unlock(&pasid_lock);
>>> -
>>> - return p;
>>> -}
>>>
>>> int vcmd_alloc_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, unsigned int
>>> *pasid) {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>>> index 8f87304..8fff212 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/dmar.h>
>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>>> +#include <linux/ioasid.h>
>>> #include <asm/page.h>
>>>
>>> #include "intel-pasid.h"
>>> @@ -211,7 +212,9 @@ static void intel_mm_release(struct
>>> mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm) rcu_read_lock();
>>> list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdev, &svm->devs, list) {
>>> intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(svm->iommu, sdev->dev,
>>> svm->pasid);
>>> - intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0, -1,
>>> 0, !svm->mm)> + /* for emulated iommu, PASID cache
>>> invalidation implies IOTLB/DTLB */
>>> + if (!cap_caching_mode(svm->iommu->cap))
>>> + intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0,
>>> -1, 0, !svm->mm);
>> This change is not documented in the commit message. Isn't it a
>> separate fix?
> right, should be separate.
>
>>> }
>>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>>
>>> @@ -332,16 +335,15 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int
>>> *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_ if (pasid_max >
>>> intel_pasid_max_id) pasid_max = intel_pasid_max_id;
>>>
>>> - /* Do not use PASID 0 in caching mode (virtualised
>>> IOMMU) */
>>> - ret = intel_pasid_alloc_id(svm,
>>> - !!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap),
>>> - pasid_max - 1,
>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>> + /* Do not use PASID 0, reserved for RID to PASID */
>>> + svm->pasid = ioasid_alloc(NULL, PASID_MIN,
>>> + pasid_max - 1, svm);
>> the fact the max is not decremented compared to intel_pasid_alloc_id
>> looks suspicious to me (exclusive to inclusive move). I guess it is a
>> fix in which case this may be documented in the commit msg?
> Yes, it should be in separate patch.
>
> VT-d will always support device with full 20bit PASID range only, we
> should fail svm_bind if device pasid_max < 20. It has to be
> included in this series otherwise we could have assigned a device with <
> 20 PASID and our virtual command can only handle full 20bit.
OK

Thanks

Eric
>
>>> + if (svm->pasid == INVALID_IOASID) {
>>> kfree(svm);
>>> kfree(sdev);
>>> + ret = ENOSPC;
>> -ENOSPC
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> - svm->pasid = ret;
>>> svm->notifier.ops = &intel_mmuops;
>>> svm->mm = mm;
>>> svm->flags = flags;
>>> @@ -351,7 +353,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int
>>> *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_ if (mm) {
>>> ret =
>>> mmu_notifier_register(&svm->notifier, mm); if (ret) {
>>> - intel_pasid_free_id(svm->pasid);
>>> + ioasid_free(svm->pasid);
>>> kfree(svm);
>>> kfree(sdev);
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -367,7 +369,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int
>>> *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_ if (ret) {
>>> if (mm)
>>> mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier,
>>> mm);
>>> - intel_pasid_free_id(svm->pasid);
>>> + ioasid_free(svm->pasid);
>> the ioasid_free returned value never is tested. Is it useful?
>>> kfree(svm);
>>> kfree(sdev);
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -400,7 +402,12 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev,
>>> int pasid) if (!iommu)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> - svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(pasid);
>>> + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, pasid, NULL);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(svm)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(svm);
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (!svm)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> @@ -422,7 +429,7 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, int
>>> pasid) kfree_rcu(sdev, rcu);
>>>
>>> if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) {
>>> -
>>> intel_pasid_free_id(svm->pasid);
>>> + ioasid_free(svm->pasid);
>>> if (svm->mm)
>>> mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier,
>>> svm->mm);
>>> @@ -457,10 +464,11 @@ int intel_svm_is_pasid_valid(struct device
>>> *dev, int pasid) if (!iommu)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> - svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(pasid);
>>> - if (!svm)
>>> + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, pasid, NULL);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(svm)) {
>>> + ret = PTR_ERR(svm);
>>> goto out;
>>> -
>>> + }
>>> /* init_mm is used in this case */
>>> if (!svm->mm)
>>> ret = 1;
>>> @@ -567,13 +575,12 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq,
>>> void *d)
>>> if (!svm || svm->pasid != req->pasid) {
>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>> - svm = intel_pasid_lookup_id(req->pasid);
>>> + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, req->pasid, NULL);
>>> /* It *can't* go away, because the driver
>>> is not permitted
>>> * to unbind the mm while any page faults
>>> are outstanding.
>>> * So we only need RCU to protect the
>>> internal idr code. */ rcu_read_unlock();
>>> -
>>> - if (!svm) {
>>> + if (IS_ERR(svm) || !svm) {
>>> pr_err("%s: Page request for
>>> invalid PASID %d: %08llx %08llx\n", iommu->name, req->pasid,
>>> ((unsigned long long *)req)[0], ((unsigned long long *)req)[1]);
>>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Eric
>
> [Jacob Pan]