From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B282FC04AB1 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F30621473 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7F30621473 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFFBB88; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96BDFA95 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:13:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BBA384F for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 22:13:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 May 2019 15:13:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from jacob-builder.jf.intel.com (HELO jacob-builder) ([10.7.199.155]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2019 15:13:44 -0700 Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:16:37 -0700 From: Jacob Pan To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API Message-ID: <20190513151637.79c273e2@jacob-builder> In-Reply-To: <1a5a5fad-ed21-5c79-9a9e-ff21fadfb95f@arm.com> References: <1556922737-76313-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1556922737-76313-3-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <44d5ba37-a9e9-cc7a-2a3a-d32b840afa29@arm.com> <7807afe9-efab-9f48-4ca0-2332a7a54950@redhat.com> <1a5a5fad-ed21-5c79-9a9e-ff21fadfb95f@arm.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , Raj Ashok , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , LKML , Alex Williamson , Andriy Shevchenko , David Woodhouse X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, 13 May 2019 18:09:48 +0100 Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On 13/05/2019 17:50, Auger Eric wrote: > >> struct iommu_inv_pasid_info { > >> #define IOMMU_INV_PASID_FLAGS_PASID (1 << 0) > >> #define IOMMU_INV_PASID_FLAGS_ARCHID (1 << 1) > >> __u32 flags; > >> __u32 archid; > >> __u64 pasid; > >> }; > > I agree it does the job now. However it looks a bit strange to do a > > PASID based invalidation in my case - SMMUv3 nested stage - where I > > don't have any PASID involved. > > > > Couldn't we call it context based invalidation then? A context can > > be tagged by a PASID or/and an ARCHID. > > I think calling it "context" would be confusing as well (I shouldn't > have used it earlier), since VT-d uses that name for device table > entries (=STE on Arm SMMU). Maybe "addr_space"? > I am still struggling to understand what ARCHID is after scanning through SMMUv3.1 spec. It seems to be a constant for a given SMMU. Why do you need to pass it down every time? Could you point to me the document or explain a little more on ARCHID use cases. We have three fileds called pasid under this struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info{} Gets confusing :) > Thanks, > Jean > > > > > Domain invalidation would invalidate all the contexts belonging to > > that domain. > > > > Thanks > > > > Eric [Jacob Pan] _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu