From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alan.cox@intel.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
ashok.raj@intel.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
pengfei.xu@intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
kevin.tian@intel.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] iommu/vt-d: Add trace events for domain map/unmap
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 05:01:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604050122.4a095569@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603011620.31999-8-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:16:18 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> +TRACE_EVENT(bounce_unmap_single,
> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr, size_t size),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(dev, dev_addr, size),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(dev_name, dev_name(dev))
> + __field(dma_addr_t, dev_addr)
> + __field(size_t, size)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name(dev));
> + __entry->dev_addr = dev_addr;
> + __entry->size = size;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev=%s dev_addr=0x%llx size=%zu",
> + __get_str(dev_name),
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->dev_addr,
> + __entry->size)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(bounce_map_sg,
> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, unsigned int i, unsigned int nelems,
> + dma_addr_t dev_addr, phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(dev, i, nelems, dev_addr, phys_addr, size),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(dev_name, dev_name(dev))
> + __field(unsigned int, i)
> + __field(unsigned int, last)
> + __field(dma_addr_t, dev_addr)
> + __field(phys_addr_t, phys_addr)
> + __field(size_t, size)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name(dev));
> + __entry->i = i;
> + __entry->last = nelems - 1;
> + __entry->dev_addr = dev_addr;
> + __entry->phys_addr = phys_addr;
> + __entry->size = size;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev=%s elem=%u/%u dev_addr=0x%llx phys_addr=0x%llx size=%zu",
> + __get_str(dev_name), __entry->i, __entry->last,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->dev_addr,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->phys_addr,
> + __entry->size)
> +);
> +
> +TRACE_EVENT(bounce_unmap_sg,
> + TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, unsigned int i, unsigned int nelems,
> + dma_addr_t dev_addr, phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size),
> +
> + TP_ARGS(dev, i, nelems, dev_addr, phys_addr, size),
> +
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __string(dev_name, dev_name(dev))
> + __field(unsigned int, i)
> + __field(unsigned int, last)
> + __field(dma_addr_t, dev_addr)
> + __field(phys_addr_t, phys_addr)
> + __field(size_t, size)
> + ),
> +
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __assign_str(dev_name, dev_name(dev));
> + __entry->i = i;
> + __entry->last = nelems - 1;
> + __entry->dev_addr = dev_addr;
> + __entry->phys_addr = phys_addr;
> + __entry->size = size;
> + ),
> +
> + TP_printk("dev=%s elem=%u/%u dev_addr=0x%llx phys_addr=0x%llx size=%zu",
> + __get_str(dev_name), __entry->i, __entry->last,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->dev_addr,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->phys_addr,
> + __entry->size)
> +);
These last two events look identical. Please use the
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() to describe the event and then DEFINE_EVENT() for
the two events.
Each TRACE_EVENT() can add up to 5k of data/text, where as a
DEFINE_EVENT() just adds around 250 bytes.
(Note, a TRACE_EVENT() is defined as a
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS()/DEFINE_EVENT() pair)
-- Steve
> +#endif /* _TRACE_INTEL_IOMMU_H */
> +
> +/* This part must be outside protection */
> +#include <trace/define_trace.h>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-03 1:16 [PATCH v4 0/9] iommu: Bounce page for untrusted devices Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] PCI: Add dev_is_untrusted helper Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] swiotlb: Split size parameter to map/unmap APIs Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted device Lu Baolu
2019-06-10 15:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 0:43 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-12 1:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 3:08 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] iommu: Add bounce page APIs Lu Baolu
2019-06-10 15:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 0:45 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-11 12:10 ` Pavel Begunkov
2019-06-12 0:52 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iommu/vt-d: Don't switch off swiotlb if use direct dma Lu Baolu
2019-06-10 15:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 2:03 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] iommu/vt-d: Check whether device requires bounce buffer Lu Baolu
2019-06-10 16:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 2:22 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iommu/vt-d: Add trace events for domain map/unmap Lu Baolu
2019-06-04 9:01 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2019-06-05 6:48 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-10 16:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 2:31 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] iommu/vt-d: Code refactoring for bounce map and unmap Lu Baolu
2019-06-03 1:16 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Use bounce buffer for untrusted devices Lu Baolu
2019-06-10 15:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] iommu: Bounce page " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 3:00 ` Lu Baolu
2019-06-12 6:22 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-06-10 16:10 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-06-12 3:04 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190604050122.4a095569@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pengfei.xu@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox