public inbox for iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Vijay Kilary <vkilari@codeaurora.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Jan Glauber <jglauber@marvell.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Jayachandran Chandrasekharan Nair <jnair@marvell.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC CFT 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Drop unused 'q' argument from Q_OVF macro
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:46:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190611134603.4253-4-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190611134603.4253-1-will.deacon@arm.com>

The Q_OVF macro doesn't need to access the arm_smmu_queue structure, so
drop the unused macro argument.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2d756e63865b..1b7e8fe26c41 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
 #define Q_IDX(q, p)			((p) & ((1 << (q)->max_n_shift) - 1))
 #define Q_WRP(q, p)			((p) & (1 << (q)->max_n_shift))
 #define Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG			(1 << 31)
-#define Q_OVF(q, p)			((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
+#define Q_OVF(p)			((p) & Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG)
 #define Q_ENT(q, p)			((q)->base +			\
 					 Q_IDX(q, p) * (q)->ent_dwords)
 
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static void queue_sync_cons_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
 static void queue_inc_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
 {
 	u32 cons = (Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons)) + 1;
-	q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
+	q->cons = Q_OVF(q->cons) | Q_WRP(q, cons) | Q_IDX(q, cons);
 }
 
 static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
 	int ret = 0;
 	u32 prod = readl_relaxed(q->prod_reg);
 
-	if (Q_OVF(q, prod) != Q_OVF(q, q->prod))
+	if (Q_OVF(prod) != Q_OVF(q->prod))
 		ret = -EOVERFLOW;
 
 	q->prod = prod;
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static void queue_sync_prod_out(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
 static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
 {
 	u32 prod = (Q_WRP(q, q->prod) | Q_IDX(q, q->prod)) + 1;
-	q->prod = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
+	q->prod = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, prod) | Q_IDX(q, prod);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1328,7 +1328,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
 	} while (!queue_empty(q));
 
 	/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
-	q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
+	q->cons = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
 	} while (!queue_empty(q));
 
 	/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
-	q->cons = Q_OVF(q, q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
+	q->cons = Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_WRP(q, q->cons) | Q_IDX(q, q->cons);
 	writel(q->cons, q->cons_reg);
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-11 13:45 [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:45 ` [RFC CFT 1/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase maximum size of queues Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:45 ` [RFC CFT 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Separate s/w and h/w views of prod and cons indexes Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move low-level queue fields out of arm_smmu_queue Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Operate directly on low-level queue where possible Will Deacon
2019-06-11 13:46 ` [RFC CFT 6/6] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Reduce contention during command-queue insertion Will Deacon
2019-06-17 13:38 ` [RFC CFT 0/6] Try to reduce lock contention on the SMMUv3 command queue John Garry
2019-06-17 18:15   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190611134603.4253-4-will.deacon@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=jglauber@marvell.com \
    --cc=jnair@marvell.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vkilari@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox