From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F0CC5ACAE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CD22087E for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B1CD22087E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976651C54; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5411C4D for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from theia.8bytes.org (8bytes.org [81.169.241.247]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9DA832 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E3E9386; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:37:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:37:27 +0200 From: "joro@8bytes.org" To: "Mehta, Sohil" Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Add Scalable Mode fault information Message-ID: <20190911103726.GB21988@8bytes.org> References: <1567793642-17063-1-git-send-email-kyung.min.park@intel.com> <20190910080823.GA3247@8bytes.org> <1568136807.58430.11.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1568136807.58430.11.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: "Shevchenko, Andriy" , "Lu, Baolu" , "Park, Kyung Min" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "Raj, Ashok" X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:30:09PM +0000, Mehta, Sohil wrote: > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 10:08 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > +=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0"Unknown", "Unknown", "Unknown", "Unknown", "Unknown", > > "Unknown", "Unknown", /* 0x49-0x4F */ > > = > > Maybe add the number (0x49-0x4f) to the respecting "Unknown" fields? > > If > > we can't give a reason we should give the number for easier debugging > > in > > the future. Same for the "Unknown" fields below. > = > I believe a fault number is always printed in=A0dmar_fault_do_one() even > if the reason is unknown. > = > DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [00:02.0] fault addr 108a000 [fault > reason 23] Unknown Right, applied the patch, thanks. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu