From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF3ECE58F for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A38E2168B for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8A38E2168B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5647DF75; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4E5F69 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EAD88E for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 17:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72400337; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C13993F6C4; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 18:46:16 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] ARM: Raspberry Pi 4 DMA support Message-ID: <20191015174616.GO13874@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20191014183108.24804-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <20191014205859.GA7634@iMac-3.local> <384b42df01c0af973002fba0d5f02068e7f2e7b3.camel@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <384b42df01c0af973002fba0d5f02068e7f2e7b3.camel@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, mbrugger@suse.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wahrenst@gmx.net X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 09:48:22AM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > A little off topic but I was wondering if you have a preferred way to refer to > the arm architecture in a way that it unambiguously excludes arm64 (for example > arm32 would work). arm32 should be fine. Neither arm64 nor arm32 are officially endorsed ARM Ltd names (officially the exception model is AArch32 while the instruction set is one of A32/T32/T16). -- Catalin _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu