From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A7C18E5B for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC20A24693 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AC20A24693 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D0C88603; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2+b58Loo0MK; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B4788674; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E39AC18D3; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D2FC0177 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D164C88353 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLF7I5k5k1oG for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from theia.8bytes.org (8bytes.org [81.169.241.247]) by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D55A88344 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by theia.8bytes.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8344F364; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:15:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:15:03 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Lu Baolu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Replace private domain with per-group default Message-ID: <20200310111503.GF3794@8bytes.org> References: <20200307062014.3288-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200307062014.3288-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Drake , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig , Derrick Jonathan X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" Hi Baolu, On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 02:20:08PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > Lu Baolu (5): > iommu: Configure default domain with dev_def_domain_type > iommu/vt-d: Don't force 32bit devices to uses DMA domain > iommu/vt-d: Don't force PCI sub-hierarchy to use DMA domain > iommu/vt-d: Add dev_def_domain_type callback > iommu/vt-d: Apply per-device dma_ops > > Sai Praneeth Prakhya (1): > iommu: Add dev_def_domain_type() callback in iommu_ops I like this patch-set, but I fear some regressions from patch "iommu/vt-d: Don't force 32bit devices to uses DMA domain". Have you tested this series on a couple of machines, ideally even older ones from the first generation of VT-d hardware? Regards, Joerg _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu