From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
zhangfei.gao@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu: Remove iommu_sva_ops::mm_exit()
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:10:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527101038.GD265288@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423125329.782066-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Hi Joerg,
I was wondering if you could take these two patches for v5.8. The API
change is a precursor for the SVA support in SMMUv3, and the VT-d
implementation of the SVA API (queued for 5.8) doesn't implement
iommu_sva_ops.
Thanks,
Jean
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> The IOMMU SVA API currently requires device drivers to implement an
> mm_exit() callback, which stops device jobs that do DMA. This function
> is called in the release() MMU notifier, when an address space that is
> shared with a device exits.
>
> It has been noted several time during discussions about SVA that
> cancelling DMA jobs can be slow and complex, and doing it in the
> release() notifier might cause synchronization issues. Device drivers
> must in any case call unbind() to remove their bond, after stopping DMA
> from a more favorable context (release of a file descriptor).
>
> Patch 1 removes the mm_exit() callback from the uacce module, and patch
> 2 removes it from the IOMMU API. Since v1 [1] I fixed the uacce unbind
> reported by Zhangfei and added details in the commit message of patch 2.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200408140427.212807-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/
> Jean-Philippe Brucker (2):
> uacce: Remove mm_exit() op
> iommu: Remove iommu_sva_ops::mm_exit()
>
> include/linux/iommu.h | 30 -------
> include/linux/uacce.h | 34 ++------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 11 ---
> drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 172 +++++++++----------------------------
> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.26.0
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 12:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu: Remove iommu_sva_ops::mm_exit() Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-04-23 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] uacce: Remove mm_exit() op Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-04-24 1:05 ` Zhangfei Gao
2020-04-23 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu: Remove iommu_sva_ops::mm_exit() Jean-Philippe Brucker
2020-05-27 10:10 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2020-05-27 12:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Joerg Roedel
2020-05-28 3:32 ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-28 3:34 ` Lu Baolu
2020-05-28 15:33 ` Jacob Pan
2020-05-29 12:53 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200527101038.GD265288@myrica \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox